|Profile||General | EIA profile | SEA profile|
|See also||Webpages (9) | Projects (9) | Library (14)|
Updated to: 27 June 2011Download as PDF
Country contact on SEA
Contact details for the country contact on SEA.
National Environment Management Authority
NEMA House, Plot 17/19/21 Jinja Road, P.O. Box 22255
Country's planning system
Brief description of planning practice, specifically whether it take place more often at centralised or decentralised level, what kind of national level planning and sectoral planning takes place, etc.
The revised Poverty Eradication Plan (PEAP) has guided the formulation of government policy since 1997. It is the national planning framework on the basis of which detailed sector wide strategies and sectoral policies are developed. Policies are formulated at national level, while plans and projects operationalize them at sub-national local level. More recently, a cross-sectoral planning approach is chosen which emphasizes public consultations and consensus building. The environment is one of the cross cutting themes within the sector wide framework.
SEA guidelines (2006)
History of SEA
Brief description of the history of SEA in the country, including when it was introduced and any major milestones in its development.
To date, SEA application in Uganda has mainly been donor driven and/or voluntary. At the moment SEA is not a regulatory instrument and therefore does not impose any additional legislative responsibility on government authorities. The EIA regulation does mention that the environmental impact assessment of a policy does not exclude the need to assess the environmental impact of specific projects proposed in accordance with the policy and that the Executive Director may, in approving the terms of reference of an environmental impact study for a project, exclude those general matters which have already been covered in the assessment of a policy. This suggest an SEA, but no clear provisions are given.
Legal framework for SEA
Any government issued guidelines on SEA (general or sectoral) are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each. Describes the legal status of the guidelines.
Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) have been issued by NEMA in 2006. They are not legally binding and aim to advise practitioners and Government Ministries.
Scope of SEA application
Describes for which planning processes (at policy, programme and plan level) SEA is required.
The guidelines for SEA (2006) suggest that SEA is required at policy, plan and programme level.
Exemptions from SEA application
Are any specific types of plans explicitly excluded from SEA application?
The non-binding SEA guidelines mention special cases for which no SEA is required:
- if a proposal is prepared in response to a clear and immediate emergency
- where the matter is of urgency
- issues that have been previously assessed for environmental impacts.
Describes the current overall SEA approach. Specifically: Has the country's SEA procedure been modeled on the existing EIA approach? Or has a separate SEA approach been developed?
The non-binding SEA guidelines suggest a flexible approach for SEA. They acknowledge that there is no best methodology for SEA and that the respective government authorities are encouraged to develop approaches that are tailored to their needs and circumstances. The guidelines thus propose an SEA procedure that is separate from EIA.
SEA tiering with EIA
Are there any provisions for tiering of EIA and SEA?
The EIA regulation mentions that the environmental impact assessment of a policy does not exclude the need to assess the environmental impact of specific projects proposed in accordance with the policy. Also it says that the Executive Director may, in approving the terms of reference of an environmental impact study for a project, exclude those general matters which have already been covered in the assessment of a policy. No direct reference to SEA is made in the legislation though.
Institutional setting for SEA
Central SEA authority
Is there a central authority in charge of the SEA system as a whole, responsible for issuing guidelines etc? If so, is it independent or linked to a higher body (e.g. ministry)?
The SEA guidelines (2006) suggest NEMA to be the central SEA authority. It is proposed that NEMA oversees the development of PPPS and ensures the integration of environmental concerns into national planning.
Initiator of the SEA
Who initiates the SEA? Should the plan owner initiate and undertake the SEA or is an environmental authority responsible for undertaking the SEA. If an authority is responsible, which authority and at which level?
According to the SEA guidelines, each individual Government Ministry, department and agency is responsible for applying SEA to its proposed policies, plans and programmes.
Overview SEA procedure
Short text characterizing the overall SEA procedure. If relevant, interesting aspects of the SEA procedure are mentioned such as: which procedural steps are part of the SEA procedure and are they based on procedures defined for EIA (screening, scoping ect)? How are they related to each other? Does the legal text provide specifications regarding the timing of the start of the SEA procedure within t
The SEA guidelines propose the following general steps for the SEA procedure:
- Identify broad plan and programme alternatives
- Situation Assessment
- Formulate sustainability parameters for the development of the plan or programme
- Develop and assess alternative plans and programmes
- Develop a plan for implementation, monitoring and auditing
The guidelines highlight though that the suggested SEA approach can be used flexibly and that it can get tailored to the needs of the respective government.
The flowchart on page 34 of the guidelines illustrates how these different stages of the SEA process relate to each other.
Describes the screening process for SEA (if any), who is involved and who is responsible. What kind documentation on the SEA needs to be submitted for screening?
The non-binding guidelines suggest screening to identify the over-arching purpose of the programme or plan and to determine whether an SEA is required. They mention that the analyst may use a variety of tools to screen the proposal, such as matrices, checklists and experts from within the department or from other departments and agencies. If the screening identifies potential for significant environmental effects or a high level of uncertainty or risk associated with the outcome of the study, then a more detailed analysis of the environmental effects should be conducted through an SEA. Appendices 6, 7and 8 of the SEA guidelines offer guidance for the screening process.
Identification of stakeholders
Are stakeholders identified early on in the SEA? Who is responsible for identifying the stakeholders? Is a communication plan developed (addressing public and government engagement, disclosure, etc?).
The guidelines suggest public involvement through the development phases of the policy. Thus, stakeholders should be identified at an early stage of the SEA.
Setting SEA objectives
Is there an early discussion on the objectives for the SEA (i.e. How it will support planning, how it will be integrated into the planning process)? Which stakeholders are involved? Are the outcomes of this discussion documented?
The guidelines suggest the formulation of sustainability objectives which are then translated into context-specific sustainability criteria and indicators. These result in a sustainability framework. Such a framework can be used to develop alternative plans and programme or evaluate alternatives.
Implementing the SEA
Is there a distinct scoping process? Who is responsible? Who is involved? What methods (if any) are prescribed (overlays, matrices, etc)?
The guidelines recommend that the first step of the scoping process is to formulate a vision and identify strategic issues to be addressed by SEA. They foresee stakeholder participation in the scoping phase. The scoping process should identify alternatives and impacts to be addressed and exclude irrelevant information.
Participation in scoping
If here is distinct scoping, is participation part of this process? Who is involved and how?
As mentioned in the SEA guidelines (2006), during the scoping stage public participation is important. Key stakeholders are said to have a coordinating role in the scoping process, for example through a steering committee. The public participation process can have different forms and should be designed in a way that it enhances the entire SEA process.
Are there any specific requirements for data collection (for example, on protected areas)?
The Annex 3 of the SEA guidelines list potential methods to be used for the baseline study.
Are there any requirements for the alternatives to be considered in the SEA? How should alternatives be selected, ranked, compared?
The SEA guidelines advise that plan or programme alternative should be formulated at the onset of the SEA process. These alternative will then be changed and refined as the plan or programme is developed.
Assessment/mitigation of effects
What are the specific requirements for assessment and mitigation of impacts as part of SEA? Any specific methods prescribed?
The guidelines propose that the analysis of the environmental considerations should be undertaken throughout the policy development process. It should be integrated into the comparison of the alternative proposals. The level of effort committed to the SEA should depend on the level of environmental impacts that could result from the implementation of the proposed PPP.
Are the assessment results documented?
The SEA guidelines advise that SEA information should be presented in either a separate report or as a chapter of the policy proposal.
Informing and influencing decision-making
SEA and planning decision-making
What is the formal role of SEA in decision-making on the plan? Is SEA approval needed before a planning decision can be made?
The guidelines foresee that SEA conclusions and recommendations should be taken into account for decision-making. Furthermore, PPP proposals should be present to NEMA for review, which then presents it to the Policy Committee on Environment, which scrutinises the proposals before forwarding it to the cabinet.
Year of first SEA
Mentions if SEA practice is carried out in a country. Information is provided regarding the beginn of SEA practice, even if there is/has been no legislation available (yet). If possible, the year when the first SEA was conducted is given (to be precise the year in which the SEA report was finalized).
SEA case studies on which information is available are listed here, including a link to case documentation, if available.
SEA-type aproaches were used to inform the development of the Poverty Eradication Action Plan (launched in 1997)
In 2009/2010, the NCEA advised on the ToR for an SEA for the oil and gas sector in Albertine Graben. This led to further involvement in this SEA, in cooperation with the Norwegian Oil for Development Program and the Uganda National Environmental Authority (NEMA). The ToR for the SEA has been adopted mid 2011 by NEMA. The SEA itself is being developed by a consultants team. In 2012, the NCEA was requested by the SEA steering committee (in which NEMA and the Ugandan Petroleum and Exploration Department have a seat) to perform independent quality assurance of the SEA inception report and interim SEA report. The SEA report is now (March) available in final draft. More information about the SEA in Albertine Graben and the NCEA's involvement in it can be found here.
Professional bodies relevant to SEA practice, such as SEA Associations, Planning Associations, etc are listed here.
East African Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (EANECE): Regional network of governmental agencies which have in their mandate environmental management, compliance and enforcement responsibilities in the East African nations of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi.
Sets out any ongoing training programmes (including professional and academic training) and major training events held in the past (with focus on recent events).
A first workshop on SEA in Uganda took place in January 2011. The workshop targeted around 15 members of the Ugandan Association of Impact Assessment and around 10 technical government staff and was meant to enable them to prepare for, coordinate the execution and manage the overall process of SEA and its embedding in decision making. During the 5 day workshop, participants practiced different steps and techniques in group exercises shaped around real life case examples of plans, programmes or policies such as the Nile Basin Power Options Development SEA and the SEA for the oil and gas developments in the Albertine Graben.During the workshop, a site visit was organized to two hydropower schemes on the Nile River in Jinja, Uganda. The first, at Owen Falls, is past the date of decommissioning and has recently been refurbished, and the second (at Bujagali) is currently under construction. The dams form part of the SEA study on the Nile Power Development Options.