|Profile||General | EIA profile | SEA profile|
|See also||Webpages (3) | Projects (0) | Library (21)|
Updated to: 03 February 2015Download as PDF
Country contact on EIA
Contact details for the country contact on EIA.
Department of Environmental Affairs
Private Bag X447, Pretoria, 0001
History of EIA
Brief description of the history of the EIA system in the country, including when it was introduced and any major milestones in its development.
EIA in South Africa dates back to 1970s. EIA was firstly undertaken on a voluntary basis until in September 1997, the government passed EIA regulations under the old Environment Conservation Act (Act 73 of 1989). They were the first legislated EIA requirements. These regulations emerged separately from the development of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) was issued in 1998. It repealed most of the previous Environment Conservation Act of 1989 but the EIA regulations still remain in force.
Since the EIA regulations came into effect in 1997, EIA practice has been developing, with several challenges cropping up. For instance, the EIA regulations did not apply to mining. In response, the DEAT promulgated new EIA Regulations under NEMA, which came into effect in July 2006. In 2010, new EIA regulations again replaced the ones from 2006. Both the provincial and national government implement these regulations. In addition, there are several sector specific regulations and guidelines that address EIA for certain projects.
Year of introduction of EIA legislation
NB: this field is only meant for the world map. It is a hidden cell that is not published on the website. If available, mention the year when detailed national EIA regulations were issued. If such regulations do not exist and if EIA practice is base
Legal framework for EIA
Year of introduction of enabling law
Year when the enabling law for EIA was issued
National Environmental Management Act (Act No 107 of 1998). The Act states that any activities (defined as projects, policies, programmes and plans) which have significant effects on the environment must be considered investigated and assessed and it outlines minimum requirements for it.
Approving authority of enabling law
Authority that approved the enabling law for EIA.
Year of introduction of first national detailed regulation for EIA
Year when when the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.
EIA regulations from 1997 firstly legislated EIA requirements. They were promulgated under the Environment Conservation Act 1989.
Approving authority of first national detailed regulation for EIA
The authority that approved the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.
The Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism has, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, developed the regulations.
Recent updates and additions to the EIA legislation
Revisions of the EIA provisions in the enabling law or the national detailed EIA regulation (procedural requirements) are named. The year is listed, and the main changes since the first regulation are mentioned, if available. Also, additional EIA-re
The National Environmental Management Act was subsequently amended on several occasions, namely in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2008, 2009 and 2013 (Act No. 14 and No. 30).
In 2006, the old EIA regulations (1997) made in terms of the Environment Conservation Act No. 73 of 1989 were replaced when DEAT promulgated new EIA regulations under the NEMA. They have then been subsequently revised and gazetted in June 2010. The new EIA regulations from 2010 repeal the ones from 2006. They were further amended in December 2010 and in December 2012, when amendments to the EIA regulations on Listing Notice 1 and 2 have been gazetted.
Sector specific procedures or regulations on EIA
Any existing sectoral procedural or content regulations are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each.
- Section 110 of the National Water Act No 36 of 1998 states that the Minister must prepare an EIA relating to any proposed waterworks.
- The Biodiversity Act No. 10, 2004 prescribes an EIA for any project that may pose a threat to any indigenous species or to the environment.
- Environmental Authorisations for mining are issued under the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA), No. 28 of 2002. Its section 39 requires an EIA and an EMP for mining activities.The DEA is merely a commenting agency for mining projects. However, according to new provisions in the NEMA amendment No 62 of 2008 and corresponding amendments to the MPRDA (still in progress), this will change. Once the new MPRDA amendment has come into effect, all new mining, exploration and production rights and renewals will have to comply with the EIA regulations of NEMA. It is proposed that DEA will eventually become the competent authority.
Any government issued guidelines on EIA (general, or sectoral) are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each. Describe the legal status of the guidelines.
A variety of different guidelines on EIA exist in South Africa.
In 2004, the DEA has published an Integrated Environmental Management Information Series (IEM) which comprises of 16 guidelines on environmental management. Some of them directly relate to EIA (e.g. on screening, scoping, stakeholder engagement, impact significance, cumulative effect assessment, strategic environmental assessment, alternatives in EIA, environmental impact reporting, review in EIA, socio-economic impact assessment ect). They can be found via the following link.
There are also departmental guidelines, general guidelines, process guidelines and specialist guidelines provided by the DEA that relate to EIAs, all of which can be accessed online. A companion guideline for the implementation of the EIA regulations of 2010 was published in 2012.
Also sector EIA guidelines exist:
- EIA Guidelines for Aquaculture (2013)
- Other draft sector guidelines for EIA for roads, energy, agri-industry, housing and linear developments (other than roads) were published by DEA in 2010 and on renewable energy in 2014.
While these guidelines are not legally binding they must be taken into account while preparing, submitting, processing or considering any application for environmental authorisation as mentioned in the EIA regulations (2010).
Objective of EIA
The objective of EIA as stated in the above described legal basis.
NEMA gives overall objectives for integrated management, which include:
(a) promoting the integration of the principles of environmental management into environmental decision-making;
(b) identifying, predict and evaluate the actual and potential impact on the environment, socio-economic conditions and cultural heritage, the risks and consequences and alternatives and options for mitigation of activities, with a view to minimising negative impacts, maximising benefits, and promoting compliance with the principles of environmental management;
(c) ensuring that the effects of activities on the environment receive adequate consideration before actions are taken in connection with them;
(d) ensuring adequate and appropriate opportunity for public participation in decisions that may affect the environment.
Scope of EIA application
Describes which types of activities require EIA (public and/or private activities; national and/or foreign initiated project; or all such projects)
The EIA regulation applies to all activities as prescribed by the Minister in charge of Environment in the EIA regulations of 1997. These include private, government, national or foreign initiated activities.
Exemptions from EIA application
Describes any (groups of) activities identified in the regulation that are exempted from the requirement to do EIA (e.g. military or emergency activities).
The EIA regulations 2010 prescribe though that any person may apply for an exemptions from any provision of the Act as it relates to EIA or from any provision of the regulations. However, an exemption from the requirement to obtain an environmental authorisation is not is not possible as NEMA determines that every listed activity must be assessed and an application for an environmental authorisation has to be submitted. Hence, there are no specified groups of activities exempted from EIA.
Companion Guidelines for EIA regulations, 2012
Institutional setting for EIA
Central EIA authority
Is there a central authority in charge of implementing EIA? Is it independent or linked to a higher body (e.g ministry)? What are its tasks related to EIA?
The Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) is the central authority on EIA. It exists in this exact for since 2009, after the administration of environmental matters has been restructured at national level. The Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) had previously responsible for EIA until then. It was split and environmental affairs component is now the Department of Environmental Affairs. DEA is an autonomous department of the Ministry of Water and Environmental Affairs.
Other key (governmental) parties involved in EIA, and their roles
Lists other key parties (e.g. a review commission, knowledge institute) that have a role in many or all EIAs.
Some EIA activities may require consultation with national sector departments and/or provincial and local authorities. Relevant state departments can access and comment on draft reports that are outputs of the EIA process.
Furthermore, the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs, as well as Members of the Executive Council (MEC) or the Minister of Mineral Resources for mining related activities can be the competent authorities for decisions related to EIA.
Mandate for exemption of EIA obligation
Describes if there is a legal mandate for a competent authority to make exemptions of EIA obligation. And if yes, under which conditions (e.g. national security, disasters or no conditions/when deemed necessary).
Upon application, the Minister in charge of the environment, the Minister of Mineral Resources or an Member of the Executive Council (MEC) may exempt any person from complying with specific provisions of the NEMA and the EIA regulations (2010).
(De)centralisation of EIA mandates
Describes if EIA mandates are (de)centralised. Vertical decentralization refers to the extent to which the responsibility for EIA processes are delegated by the central government to the provincial or local authorities. Sectoral or horizontal decen
DEA is responsible for EIA at the national, as well as the provincional level. While the policy formulation and coordination takes place at the national level, the approval for EIA for most development projects has been devolved to the provinces. Provincial environmental authorities are mandated as the relevant authority to receive and consider EIA applications that are cross-boundary between districts. In cases where a project falls within a certain district, it is possible for a higher authority than the competent authority to designate the local authority for EIA.
The section 24(C)(2) of the National Environmental MAnagement Act of 2004 (Second Amendment) specified which instances form the exception when the Minister takes the role of the competent authority rather than the provincial departments. In most provinces the administrative unit involved with EIA is located within departments dealing with natural resource management, rural development, tourism, conservation, economic development or agriculture. Among others, they may undertake the following functions: Advice the proponent one EIA and provide him the necessary information, receive applications, review them and make a decision regarding the applications.
Walmsley B. & Patel S., 2012. SADC Environmental Legislation Handbook 2012. Development Bank of Southern Africa, Noordhoek, South Africa.
Overview EIA procedure
Characterizes the overall EIA procedure. If relevant, interesting aspects of the EIA procedure are mentioned such as: which procedural steps are part of the EIA procedure? How are they linked to each other? Are there different levels of assessment di
In South Africa, the EIA process can also be called the environmental authorisation process as it starts with an application for an environmental authorisation and leads up to getting such a permit. Two levels of assessment are distinguished: a basic assessment process and a full EIA. They require different levels of detail of the information that has to be collected and assessed. The full EIA process comprises of the following steps:
- Assessment study (may involve specialist studies and specialised processes)
- Decision making
An overview of how the different processes related to each other is provided by the flowchart that can be found on the pages 10, 15 and 19 of the Companion Guideline for the Implementation of the EIA regulations from 2010.
The following milestone documents are outputs of the EIA process:
Application form for environmental authorisation (during Screening), plan of study for EIA (during Scoping), Scoping report, specialist report and specialised processes (if applicable), EIA report or a Basic Assessment Report, Environmental Management
Programme (EMP), Environmental Authorisation document.
Screening requirement and authority
Describes if a formal screening decision required, and if so, which authority is responsible for this decision. Is this decision published?
Screening is done by the relevant authority at national, provincial or local level, as may be designated.
Describes the screening process: steps in screening, the stakeholders involved and outcomes of the process, status of screening advice of different stakeholders, etc. Also describes any prescribed methods for screening. If preliminary EIA's / light EIA's / Initial Environmental Evaluations (IEE) are done in this country and which criteria determine whether a preliminary or a full EIA is requested
The EIA regulations distinguish between two levels of assessment, a Basic Assessment (BA) and a full EIA. The purpose of the BA process is to streamline EIA so that smaller-scale activities, such as road widening, construction of dams below 5m in height etc., are not subjected to a full EIA process. It does not include a scoping phase. Three different lists of projects and activities are provided that determine what type of assessment is required. List 1 refers to activities requiring a Basic Assessment, while activities under List 2 require scoping and a full EIA. These lists can be found in Government notice no R. R544 and R545 of 2010. List 3 in Notice R546 lists activities that would require authorisation if carried out in certain geographical areas. These 3 Screening lists are inclusive and use thresholds based on initiative features and environmental parameters.
The proponent is required to appoint an Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) who determines whether a basic assessment or full EIA is required. In both cases, the EAP has to consult with the public, designated competent authority and other relevant stakeholders. The EAP is required to consider the input by the stakeholders before submitting the screening report for the screening decision by the DEA.
Provision for sensitive areas
Are specific requirements formulated for environmentally sensitive areas? (e.g. no minimum thresholds, full EIA instead of partial EIA)
List 3 used for the screening process lists activities for which an environmental authorisation has to be acquired for specific geographical areas. There are specific requirements formulated for protected areas. A full EIA is required for projects that have an effect on a national protected area. In such cases, the Minister is designated as the competent authority.
Contents of the starting document
Describes the required content of the starting document (if any) that the proponent should submit to the competent authority for EIA screening. Mentions if the starting document is published.
The starting document consists of a completed prescribed application form with additional documents. The enclosed documents depend on whether only a basic assessment or a full EIA is required. If a basic assessment is required, the EAP must submit the completed application form together with the basic assessment report and evidence of consultation with relevant stakeholders, a declaration of interest to perform the EIA and the specified application fee, if any. If a full EIA is needed, the EAP must complete and submit the application form together with a filled declaration of interest form and the prescribed application fee, if any.
Maximum number of (working) days allowed between submission of the starting document and the screening decision.
Is a formal scoping step required as part of the EIA process?
Scoping is a required step but only for major activities that must undergo a full EIA, as listed in Government notice no R. 545 of 2010, List 2.
Describes who carries main responsibility to undertake scoping and what the roles and responsibilities of the involved parties during the process are. Specifically, is there independent formulation and/or review of the scoping document, approval of the scoping document? Are any methods prescribed, e.g. participation, checklists. What guidance is provided?
Scoping the responsibility of the applicant who may acquire services of an approved Environmental Assessment Practitioner. Scoping is mainly done through the involvement of relevant stakeholders. The EIA guidelines of 2010 provide a guide as to the steps to be taken during the scoping process (Section 27). After submitting an application for which scoping is required, the proponent must:
i) conduct the public participation process;
ii) give notice in writing of the proposed application to any state agency with jurisdiction on the proposed activity;
iii) open and maintain a register for public participation;
iv) consider all objections and representations received from interested and affected parties;
v) identify relevant issues, potential environmental impacts, alternatives of the project activity;
vi) prepare a scoping report which must be commented on by all concerned parties;
vii) give interested and affected parties an opportunity to comment on the scoping report;
viii) submit the scoping report to the competent authority for review and decision-making.
Once it is submitted, the compentent authority then takes a decision on on whether the Scoping report is approved, rejected or if amendments should be done to it.
Contents of the scoping document
Explains if there are there specific requirements for the content of the scoping document, and if so, what these are.
The section 28 of the EIA regulations (2010) give detailed requirements for the scoping report. In summary, the scoping document should contain:
(a) Environmental Assessment practitioner and their EIA expertise;
(b) a description of the proposed activity;
(c) a description of the proposed alternatives;
(d) a description of the location of the activity;
(e) a description of the environment that may be affected by the activity;
(f) legal framework
(g) a description of environmental issues and potential impacts;
(h) details of the public participation process, includign minutes of meetings held and received comments
(i) description of the need and desirability of the proposed activity;
(j) responses of EAP's to received comments
(k) a plan of study for environmental impact assessment
(l) any specific information required by the competent authority.
In addition, a scoping report must take into account any guidelines applicable to the kind of activity, which is the subject of the application.
Number of (working) days for the decision on approval of the scoping document by the competent authority.
The timeframe for taking the decision on approving the scoping report is 30 days.
Assessment and reporting
Steps and roles of stakeholders in the assessment and status of the input of the stakeholders. Also sets out methods for assessment of the environmental impacts of the activity, if prescribed, and whether the assessment covers environmental, social, economic and/or transboundary effects.
The assessment process begins with the acceptance of the scoping report by the competent authority. After this, the EAP proceeds with tasks according to the approved plan of study for EIA which the EAP submits as part of the scoping report, including those relating to public participation.
Assessment and reporting is the responsibility of the applicant who may acquire services of an approved EAP. The applicant or the EAP managing the application may appoint an expert to carry out a specialist study or a specialised process. The content of a specialist report or a specialised process is determined in Section 32 of the EIA regulations (2010).
The EIA regulations do not prescribe any specific method of assessment.
Contents of the EIA report
Explains what should be contained in the EIA report. Specifies if a potential Environmental Management Plan is part of the EIA report or if it is a separate document that contributes to the EIA process.
The EIA regulation (2010) gives in the section 31 a detailed description of the contents of an environmental impact assessment report. In summary, these include details of:
(i) details of the EAP;
(ii) description of the proposed activities;
(iii) description of the location of the activities;
(iv) a description of the environment that may be affected;
(v) details of the public participation process;
(vi) description of the need and desirability of the activities
(vii) description of potential alternatives to the activities and their analysis;
(viii) indication of the adopted methodology;
(ix) a summary of the findings and recommendations of any specialist report or report on a specialised process;
(x) environmental issues identified;
(xi) significant impacts;
(xii) assumptions, uncertainties and gaps in knowledge;
(xiii) a reason opinion as to whether the activity should or should not be authorised;
(xiv) a draft EMP;
(xv) copies of any specialist reports and reports on specialised processes; and
(xvi) any specific information that may be required by the competent authority.
For activities subjected to a Basic Assessment, a Basic Assessment Report (BAR) is required. Its content is specified in Section 22 of the EIA regulations (2010).
Overview of the review process, including: steps in the process and roles of the stakeholders, status of the input of the stakeholders. Is the process open to public? Review method: internal review, external review, panel/commission (permanent or temporary), are the review results documented? Are the review criteria general or case by case? Are the review results documented? Is a potential review
The competent and other relevant authorities are responsible for review. Although the NEMA provides for mechanisms for independent review, the current EIA regulations do not require peer review. They state that the relevant authority should review the EIA report with the assistance of other authorities, specialists, interested and affected parties. The competent authority can either accept the EIA report or refer it for specialised review by a team for their comments especially where technical knowledge or a high level of objectivity is required to review any aspect of the report. The role of the public during the review process is not clear.
Southern Africa Institute for Environmental Assessment. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment in Southern Africa. Windhoek. Southern Africa Institute for Environmental Assessment
Describes if the EIA is checked by external parties, and if so to what extent these represent required disciplines/expertise. Also sets out if measures have been taken to ensure that reviewers are impartial?
There are provisions to appoint technical specialist to review EIA reports.
Number of (working) days for review of the EIA by the competent authority.
The timeframe for reviewing the EIA report is 60 days. For a Basic Assessment Report the competent authority has 30 days to accept, reject it, suggest alternatives or to subject it to full EIA.
Integration of EIA into decision-making
Describes what kind of decision-making processes the EIA is intended to support. We look specifically at the decision on EIA approval, and how this relates to envirionmental approval for the project, and other project approval decisions (permits) needed before a project can proceed. This category describes which decisions are influenced by EIA and how they are linked to each other.
Once the EIA report is approved, a decision is taken on whether an environmental authorisation is granted for the activity. Such an environmental authorisation is required before any activities can be undertaken by the developer. In the EIA regulations the whole EIA process is described as the application process for such an environmental authorisation, thus EIA is supporting the decision on this authorisation. However, the granting of an environmental authorisation does not necessarily lead to a project approval. Other licences separate from the one issued by DEA have to be received from other relevant authorities before proposed project activities can be commenced.
Describes which authority/authorities is/are responsible for each of the main decision-making processes on EIA (EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval). It is explained if those decisions are taken by the same or different authorities.
The competent authority taking the decision on whether the environmental authorisation is granted or not can be the Minister of Environmental Affairs, Members of the Executive Council (MEC), the Minister of Mineral Resources for mining related activites or the provincial or local environmental authorities with delegated powers. Which authority is the competent authority depends on the type of activity. The Schedules 1,2 and 3 that are used for the screening process and categorize the activities, give provisions on how the responsible competent authority can be identified for the different activities.
Mentions if the decision (on EIA approval and/or environmental approval) is linked to certain documents (e.g. environmental management plan, permit conditions) in order to facilitate the management of environmental risks during project implementation. Also describes if commitments of the proponent are incorporated into legally binding instruments.
According to the Regulations 37(1), the environmental authorisation must, besides other elements, contain authorisation conditions and information on the manner in which and when the competent authority will approve the EMP. Furthermore, the Environmental Authorisation may require that compliance reports, environmental audit reports or proof of compliance (for mining) are prepared and submitted to the competent authority.
Sets out requirements for justification of the consideration of the EIA information in decision-making (on EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval).
The decision of the authority on the application is communicated in writing to the applicant and reasons for the decision are given.
EIA regulations 2010 section 10
Does the decision (on EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval) have to be published? Also, is the decision justification published as well?
Decisions have to be made public. The applicant or the EAP managing the application is required, in writing, to inform registered interested and affected parties of the outcome of the application and the reasons for the decision and draw their attention to the fact that they can appeal the decision.
Maximum number of (working) days available to the competent authority to make the EIA based decision (EIA approval, environmental clearance and/or project approval).
The competent authority must within 45 days of acceptance of the EIA report refuse or grant the environmental authorisation. For activities that are subjected to a basic assessment process, the decision shall be taken within 30 days from the approval of the BAR.
Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement
Is compliance monitoring required to check if the project is implemented as described in the EIA documents and/or if mitigation of environmental impacts complies with applicable standards and other measures set out in the EIA documents? Who is responsible for ensuring compliance? How does this authority ensure compliance (for example, through inspections)? And what requirements are there for the p
Monitoring is a mandatory requirement. Despite this requirement by NEMA, the current EIA regulation (2010) does not provide prescriptions for these additional steps. The applicant is required to submit an Environmental Management Plan as part of the EIA study report. The EMP should give the proposed mechanisms for monitoring compliance and reporting thereon. The environmental authorisation issued by the competent authority also includes the requirements for the management, monitoring and reporting of the impacts of the activity on the environment throughout the life cycle of the activity.
Are there monitoring requirements that involve external parties, such as citizen monitoring (for example, through a complaints procedure), or third party auditing?
There are no specific provisions given for external monitoring.
Are there penalties that the authority responsible for compliance can apply if environmental conditions are not met? What are these? (for example, fines, suspension of license)
Article 47 of the EIA regulations (2010) promulgate that the compentent authority may suspend an Environmental Authorisation for several reasons, for instance if there are reasonable grounds for believing that the contravention or non-compliance with a condition of the authorisation causes harm to the environment or if it is necessary to prevent such harm. The Article 48 defines the procedures to be followed in case of such a suspension.
Section 71 (1) further states that a person is guilty of an offence if that person
provides misleading or incorrect information, fails to disclose information to the competent authority, fails to comply with a request to submit an environmental audit report, fails to comply with any conditions granted in an authorised exemption, continues with an activity for which an Environmental Authorisation was suspended. A person is liable on conviction of an offence can be punished with imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year or to a fine prescribed not exceeding R1 million, or to both a fine and imprisonment.
Is the proponent required to pay a fee when applying for an EIA? Is this fee linked to a permitting fee, or separate? If yes, when is this paid and to whom (to the agency that issues the license or to a central agency)?
The proponent may be required to pay to DEAT a specified administration fee when submitting an application for environmental authorisation. Additionally, the proponent may also be required to pay a specified fee when submitting an application for amendment and withdrawal of Environmental authorisations.
Public participation requirements for EIA process stages
Describes for which of the EIA process stages public participation is required.
Public participation is required both for projects that require only basic assessment (during screening) or and projects that require full EIA (screening, scoping and EIA study). There are however, there are no provisions for public participation during the decision phase and during monitoring of EIA activities.
Public participation arrangements
Relevant information regarding the arrangements for public participation are provided here (e.g. who is responsible for it, who is consulted, does the legislation mention consultation or participation, for which project should consultations be held, are public hearings held etc.)
The public participation process involves the information of the public and providing access to any draft outputs of the EIA process or the basic assessment process to potential interested and affected people. Also, the people are given opportunities to comment on these reports and statements. The public is also informed about decisions and their reasoning. Guidelines on public participation must be followed as contemplated in section 24J of the NEMA.
Public participation guidance
Has any guidance on participation been provided?
Access to information
Which of the information that is generated in the EIA process is available to the public? Specifically, which reports and decision statements?
There are provisions prescribing that every person is entitled to have access to information held by the State and department of state on environmental issues. Also, all relevant facts in respect of the application for an environmental authorisation shall be made available to potential interested and affected parties. The proponent or the EAP is required by law to open a register of interested and affected parties. Any person who submits a request for it can access this register.
Before the EAP submits a report to the competent authority, she/he must give registered interested and affected parties access to the draft report. Also they must be given an opportunity to comment on all these written submissions of the EIA process, namely:
- BARs that have been amended or resubmitted
- Scoping reports
- Scoping reports that have been amended and resubmitted
- Specialist reports and reports on specialised processes
- EIA reports
- EIA reports that have been amended and resubmitted
- Draft EMPs
Moreover, these draft reports must also be referred to the relevant state department which also has the opportunity to make comments on them.
How can the public receive the information that is publicly available? Are there public announcement on the proceedings? How/where are these published? Is information made available locally? Is information sent on request? etc.
Section 54 of the EIA regulations (2010) determines that the person conducting a public participation process must give notice to all interested and affected parties by (in summary):
(a) Fixing a notice board at a place conspicuous to the public at the site of the activities
(b) giving written notice to several affected people and institutions
(c) placing an advertisement in a local newspaper or in any official gazette that is published specifically to provide public notice and in at least one provincional or national newspaper if the activity may have impacts beyond the local level
(d) using other reasonable alternative methods
Timeline for public comments
The number of (working) days available for the public to make comments on the EIA decision document.
10 days after notification of decision
Costs for public
Are there any specified costs public parties will incur if they partake in EIA?(e.g. costs for the receiving report, costs of losing an appeal, etc. Costs associated with travel to meetings or such are not included here)
There is no clear information on payment for accessing information by the public. Nevertheless, to make an appeal either to the Minister or the MEC, there is a requirement for any appellant to pay a specified fee.
What options do the public have to provide their comments. Should comments be written, or may they also be verbal? To which agency should they provide their submissions?
Section 56 of the EIA regulations (2010) entitles registered parties to comment on submissions of the EIA process in writing.
Public comments in decision-making
Do the EIA and/or project approval decisions have to be justified on the basis of public participation results? Do legal texts indicate how public participation results should be used and to which decision-making processses they should contribute?
It is a requirement that the comments of interested and affected parties regarding any of the written submissions of the EIA process must be recorded and accompany the report when it is submitted to the competent authority. The EAP also has to explain any responses to the representations, objections, comments and views of the public.
Possibilities for appeal
What are the legal recourse options to challenge EIA decisions are provided for within the legal framework?
A person who wishes to appeal against a decision, must submit a notice of intention to appeal with the Minister in charge of the environment, the MEC or a delegated organ of state to the appeal authority. An appeal panel can be appointed to support the processing of the appeal. It submits its recommendations to the competent authority in writing. The Minister in charge of the environment, MEC or Minister of Mineral Resources or any other empowered competent authority then make a decision on the appeal.
EIA regulations (2010) Section 58-66
Decisions that can be appealed
Which EIA decisions can be appealed?
The EIA regulations (2010) determine which decisions can be appealed depending on the competent authority that has taken the decision. Their section 58 prescribes that the following decisions can be appealed:
- decisions that were taken by an organ of state that has delegated powers as the competent authority
- decisions that are subject to an appeal to the Minister in charge of the environment or Members of the Executive Council (MEC) in terms of section 43(1) of the NEMA
An appeal is not possible if the Minister or Members of the Executive Council (MEC) took the decisions themselves in their capacity as the competent authority.
Who can appeal
Who can make an appeal (in other words, has legal standing)?
The EIA regulations make provisions for a person affected by a decision to make an appeal against it. Different requirements are named for when the appellant is an applicant for the environmental authorisation or for when the appellant is any other person than the applicant.
Central EIA database
Is there a central database or library where information on EIAs is kept (i.e. where all EIAs are registered and/or copies are archived). If so, what is kept there and is this information publicly accessible?
The relevant authority registers applications by the applicant/consultant.
Any EIA practice review studies that have been done (by governmental agencies or others) are listed here. Where relevant, links to studies are included, and the main conclusions of the studies are summarised.
- Review of the effectiveness and efficiency of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in South Africa July 2008. As part of an ongoing programme to improve EIA, the DEAT initiated this project to review the effectiveness and efficiency of EIA in South Africa and to make recommendations for a long-term environmental impact strategy and action plan.
- Review of the Application of Environmental Impact Assessment in Selected African Countries (United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, 2005). This report includes good practices and lessons learned from different countries and provides an account of country experiences in the institutionalization and application of EIA as well as an overview of the status of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) institutionalization and application.
- Betey C.B. & Godfred E., 2013. Environmental Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development in Africa: A critical review. Environment and Natural Resources Research. Vol 3 No. 2, 37-51.
Accreditation of consultants
Is there and accreditation system operational in the country to certify consultants to do EIAs?
The accreditation system of consultant is recently changing. In 2011, the Environmental Assessment Practitioners Association of South Africa (EAPASA) was launched. Once constituted the Board of EAPASA will apply to the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs to be recognised as a Registration Authority in terms of Section 24H of the NEMA. Once EAPASAhas been recognised, the Minister will publish a date by which all EAPs practicing in terms of NEMA must be registered.
In the mean time, the only specified requirements in the EIA regulations (2010) for EA practitioners are that they must be independent, have the necessary expertise in conducting EIAs, have an understanding of the legal requirements, perform work in an objective manner and take into account the issues listed in section 17 of the EIA regulations (2010). Three main bodies in South Africa verify and certify environmental practitioners and maintain a professional register. These include The South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP); The Southern African Institute for Ecologists and Environmental Scientists (SAIEES); and, most recently, The Interim Certification Board for Environmental Assessment Practitioners (ICB). The former is a statutory body carrying out mandatory registration, while the latter two are professional bodies conducting voluntary certification
Professional bodies relevant to EIA practice in the country, such as EIA Associations, Environmental Expert Associations, etc are listed here.
Centre for Public Participation: The Centre for Public Participation is an independent non-partisan organisation contributing towards the buildings of an empowered civil society engaging actively with accessible and accountable structures and processes of government. Through its monitoring, lobbying, research and capacity building programmes, it strives to ensure that the government policy and legislative processes are transparent, accessible and accountable ;
International Association for Impact Assessment South African Affiliate (IAIAsa): The website of IAIAsa contains useful information, resources and links for EIA practitioners, as well as information on forthcoming conferences
The Southern Africa Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA) is an independent organisation, with access to a large number of professionals from within the southern African region, who provide expertise in a wide range of fields and disciplines. Their website contains links to case studies, EIA guidelines, Manuals and training on EIA.
The Environmental Assessment Practitioners Association of South Africa (EAPASA) performs a quality assurance role in EA practice. 802 individuals are the founding members and form the organisation. It has not yet been consituted.
Non-governmental EIA guidance
Lists any EIA manuals and good practice publications (including checklists, case studies) that have been published by parties other than government.
Sasol Public Participation Manual: Sasol Limited is a global energy company with headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa. It is engaged in the commercial production and marketing of chemicals and liquid fuels; with a growing interest in oil and gas exploration. They have produced a manual for public participation.
Ongoing training programmes (including professional and academic training) and major training events held in the past (with focus on recent events) are mentioned here.
Capacity Building in Biodiversity and Impact Assessment, Southern Africa: The CBBIA was a three-year global project managed by IAIA and funded by the Dutch government. The project aimed to integrate biodiversity conservation with impact assessment (both EIA and SEA), and develop requisite capacities among stakeholders in developing countries in several regions, including southern Africa, Central America and Asia. The modality of implementation is to work with and through focal organisations, which can effectively implement the project at regional and country level.
Calabash Program – In cooperation with CIDA and supported by World Bank TF-ESSD funds SAIEA has launched the Calabash Project in 2003. The project is one step of many to assist the SADC region to move forward on democratic reform by using EIA as a catalyst for participatory decision-making by providing appropriate tools knowledge and networks to regulators, civil society, practitioners and industry of the SADC region.
SAIEA Capacity building: SAIEA provides a range of training and skills-development programmes relating to EIA and sustainable development. Training is targeted at government officials, developers, non-government organisations, the private sector and EIA practitioners. Current activities include the development of training materials, presenting short training courses and hosting the Professional Development Programme, which provides participants with hands-on experience in conducting an EIA under field conditions.
Links to laws/regulation
Any relevant links to laws or regulations are included here.
- Links to regulation website DEA
- Western Cape Gateway overview of EIA regulation and guidance
Other relevant links on EIA
Any other relevant links (for example to country specific guidance documents) are included here.