South Sudan

Profile General | EIA profile | SEA profile
See also Webpages (1) | Projects (1) | Library (2)

EIA profile

Updated to: 26 September 2013

Download as PDF

EIA background

to the top

History of EIA

Brief description of the history of the EIA system in the country, including when it was introduced and any major milestones in its development.

After signing of the Comprehensive Peace Accord between the Sudan People's Liberation Movement and the Government of Sudan in 2005, Southern Sudan became an autonomous region consisting of 10 states of Sudan. Under the Government of Southern Sudan (GOSS), the development of an environmental legal framework started. In 2010, an Environmental Policy and an Environmental Protection Bill were drafted. The Environmental Policy determines the need for systematic environmental impact assessment, audits, monitoring and evaluation to mitigate adverse impacts and enhance environmental benefits. It suggests the development of a legal framework and guidance for EIA. In 2011, South Sudan became independent. The drafts that had been developed by the GOSS before the independence, also apply for the newly formed state as no more recent legislation has been established yet. The EIA system is thus under development and has not yet been legally established.

Year of introduction of EIA legislation

NB: this field is only meant for the world map. It is a hidden cell that is not published on the website. If available, mention the year when detailed national EIA regulations were issued. If such regulations do not exist and if EIA practice is base

2010

Legal framework for EIA

to the top

Year of introduction of enabling law

Year when the enabling law for EIA was issued

An Environmental Protection Bill was drafted by GOSS in 2010 which forsees EIA. The Bill is not yet approved though and it is unclear if this will still happen considering the changing political circumstances.

2010

Approving authority of enabling law

Authority that approved the enabling law for EIA.

The Bill is not yet approved.

Year of introduction of first national detailed regulation for EIA

Year when when the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.

No regulations for EIA exist.

Guidelines

Any government issued guidelines on EIA (general, or sectoral) are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each. Describe the legal status of the guidelines.

No guidelines on EIA have been issued yet. The need for such guidelines is recognized though as the existing drafts on environmental policies indicate. The Environmental Protection Bill Draft (2010) however foresees the adoption of general guidelines on the EIA review process, environmental impact evaluations and the EIS. Also, the Environment Policy Draft of 2010 mentions that EIA guidelines shall be developed for all sectors.

Institutional setting for EIA

to the top

Central EIA authority

Is there a central authority in charge of implementing EIA? Is it independent or linked to a higher body (e.g ministry)? What are its tasks related to EIA?

The Draft of the Environmental Protection Bill (2010) forsees the Ministry responsible for environmental issue to have a central role in the EIA process, but also so-called Lead Agencies. These can be any ministry, directorate, department, parastatal agency, Local Government or public officer in which or in whom any law vests functions of control or management of any segment of the environment. This includes the Southern Sudan Environmental Management Authority indended to be established with Article 8 of the Bill.

EIA procedure

to the top

Overview EIA procedure

Characterizes the overall EIA procedure. If relevant, interesting aspects of the EIA procedure are mentioned such as: which procedural steps are part of the EIA procedure? How are they linked to each other? Are there different levels of assessment di

The EIA process is not legally established. The Draft Environmental Protection Bill of 2010 gives some indications on how the legal requirements for the EIA process are intended to be formulated. The available information on the steps of the EIA procedure is limited, but some provisions are made on Screening, the assessment process, the review process and on monitoring.

Screening

Screening process

Describes the screening process: steps in screening, the stakeholders involved and outcomes of the process, status of screening advice of different stakeholders, etc. Also describes any prescribed methods for screening. If preliminary EIA's / light EIA's / Initial Environmental Evaluations (IEE) are done in this country and which criteria determine whether a preliminary or a full EIA is requested

The Draft Environmental Protection Bill (2010) forsees that projects that require a certain level of  EIA can be allocated to one of the following projects categories:
Category A: projects that may have an impact on the environment
Category B: projects that are likely to have significant impacts on the environment
Category C: projects that will have a significant impact on the environment.

The Lead Agency decides about the likelyhood of the impacts of the projects on the environment. Depending on the impact probability and scale, different levels of EIA are foreseen:
Category A projects require an Environmental Impact Review, Category B projects a Environmental Impact Evaluation and for projects of Category C a full Environmental Impact Statement has to be formulated. If the Environmental Impact Review or the Environmental Impact Evaluation reveal that the project will lead to significant impacts on the environment, the Lead Agency shall require that an Environmental Impact Statement is formulated for those projects as well.

Scoping

Assessment and reporting

Assessment process

Steps and roles of stakeholders in the assessment and status of the input of the stakeholders. Also sets out methods for assessment of the environmental impacts of the activity, if prescribed, and whether the assessment covers environmental, social, economic and/or transboundary effects.

The Draft Environmental Protection Bill (2010) implies that the EIA is conducted by an external expert who has been approved by the Ministry responsible for environmental issues. Guidelines are expected to be developed which determine the requirements for Environmental Impact Statements.
The EIS shall be  made available to the Ministry, the Lead Agency or any person requesting it.

Review

Review process

Overview of the review process, including: steps in the process and roles of the stakeholders, status of the input of the stakeholders. Is the process open to public? Review method: internal review, external review, panel/commission (permanent or temporary), are the review results documented? Are the review criteria general or case by case? Are the review results documented? Is a potential review

The Draft Environmental Protection Bill (2010) indicates that the Lead Agency will review the EIS in consultation with the Ministry responsible for environmental issues.

Timeline Review

Number of (working) days for review of the EIA by the competent authority.

45 days are available for the review process, as the Draft Environmental Protection Bill indicates.

Decision-making

Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement

Compliance monitoring

Is compliance monitoring required to check if the project is implemented as described in the EIA documents and/or if mitigation of environmental impacts complies with applicable standards and other measures set out in the EIA documents? Who is responsible for ensuring compliance? How does this authority ensure compliance (for example, through inspections)? And what requirements are there for the p

The Draft Environmental Protection Bill (2010) mentions that the proponent is required to take practical measures to ensure that the requirements of the EIS are complied with. It also mentions that the proponent shall submit quarterly and annual reports to the Ministry which describe the extent to which the operation of the project conforms with the statements made in the EIS. In case of undesirable effects that were not considered in the EIS, the proponent shall develop mitigation measures for them. He shall then prepare and submit an environmental audit report on those measures quarterly and annually or as otherwise required by the Authority. Moreover, the proponent shall conduct environmental audits in consultations with the Lead Agency.
Finally, environmental inspectors may enter any land or premises for the purpose of monitoring the compliance of the propnent with the statements made in the EIS.

Public participation

Access to information

Which of the information that is generated in the EIA process is available to the public? Specifically, which reports and decision statements?

The Draft Environmental Protection Bill (2010) forsees that the EIS is a public document and that it is made available to any person upon payment of the prescribed fee.

Costs for public

Are there any specified costs public parties will incur if they partake in EIA?(e.g. costs for the receiving report, costs of losing an appeal, etc. Costs associated with travel to meetings or such are not included here)

The Draft Environmental Protection Bill (2010) indicates that a fee has to be paid by people who want to access the EIS.

Legal recourse

EIA practice

to the top

EIA links

to the top