Profile General | EIA profile | SEA profile
See also Webpages (17) | Projects (26) | Library (9)

EIA profile

Updated to: 08 May 2017

Download as PDF

EIA background

to the top

Country contact on EIA

Contact details for the country contact on EIA.

Ministry for Environment, Land, and Rural Development (MITADER)
Address: Av. 10 de Novembro, Praceta 1196 Nº 40, Maputo, Mocambique
Tel: (+258) 21303650
Fax: (+258) 21306212

History of EIA

Brief description of the history of the EIA system in the country, including when it was introduced and any major milestones in its development.

In the early 1990s it was recognized that the environmental legislation of Mozambique was outdated. At the same time, EIA was starting to be applied. The National Environmental Management Programme (1995) of the newly formed MICOA outlines the priorities for environmental management and sustainable development in Mocambique. EIA is first mentioned in 1995, in the National Environmental Policy (Resolution 5/95 of 6 of December). The Environment Law of 1997 sets the foundation of a whole set of legal instruments for the protection of the environment. It requires licensing activities which are dependent on an appropriate level of EIA. In 1998 the first Regulation on EIA was established (Decreto 76/98 of 29 of December) which set out the EIA process. This Regulation was abolished and replaced by a new one in 2004 (Decree 45/2004 of 29th of September), which was partially rectified in 2008 (Decree 42/2008 of 4th of November). In 2015, a new regulation on the process of environmental impact assessment was established(Decree 54/2015), thereby replacing the Decrees 45/2004 and 42/2008.

Year of introduction of EIA legislation

NB: this field is only meant for the world map. It is a hidden cell that is not published on the website. If available, mention the year when detailed national EIA regulations were issued. If such regulations do not exist and if EIA practice is base

In 1997 EIA legislation was introduced.

Legal framework for EIA

to the top

Year of introduction of enabling law

Year when the enabling law for EIA was issued

The Environmental Law (1997) establishes the regime of environmental licencing based on EIA.

Approving authority of enabling law

Authority that approved the enabling law for EIA.

Assembly of the Republic

Year of introduction of first national detailed regulation for EIA

Year when when the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.

Decree No. 76 of 1998 provided first national regulations on the procedure for EIA.

Approving authority of first national detailed regulation for EIA

The authority that approved the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.

Decree No. 76 was approved by the Council of Ministers.

Recent updates and additions to the EIA legislation

Revisions of the EIA provisions in the enabling law or the national detailed EIA regulation (procedural requirements) are named. The year is listed, and the main changes since the first regulation are mentioned, if available. Also, additional EIA-re

Decree 45/2004 of 29 September sets out the EIA process and has replaced the Decree No. 76 of 1998. It was partially rectified with Decree 42/2008 of 4 November. In 2015, a new Decree  on Regulations of the process of environmental impact assessment was established (54/2015, 31 December).

Moreover, the following legislation has been issued:
- Decree 32/2003: Environmental auditing

- Ministerial Decree 129/2006 of 19 July: General Policy for EIA;

- Ministerial Decree 130/2006 of 19 July: General Directive for Public Participation process in EIA

- Diploma Ministerial 189/2006 of 14 December: General Norms for Environmental Management of Mining Activities;

- Decree 31/2015 of 31 December: Regulations of the Mining Law;

- Decree 56/2010 of 22 November: Environmental Regulations for Oil Operations.


Sector specific procedures or regulations on EIA

Any existing sectoral procedural or content regulations are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each.

The new Decree on Environmental Impact Assessment (54/2015) stipulates that for the mining and oil sector specific environmental regulations apply. For mining projects, the environmental impact assessment process is supervised by the National Mining Institute and the relevant national or provincial department, depending on the size of the project. Also, the Regulations of the Mining Law (31/2015) established that social impacts of mining projects need to be identified and addressed. For Oil and Gas projects, MITADER and other ministries need to collaborate in their decision-making regarding EIAs.


Any government issued guidelines on EIA (general, or sectoral) are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each. Describe the legal status of the guidelines.

The General Policy for the Preparation of EIAs (Ministerial Decree 129/2006 of 19 of July gives a set of global  guidelines and parameters to which all EIAs should comply.

Objective of EIA

The objective of EIA as stated in the above described legal basis.

No objectives are defined.

Scope of EIA application

Describes which types of activities require EIA (public and/or private activities; national and/or foreign initiated project; or all such projects)

All activities, public or private, that have a direct or indirect impact on the environment are subject to EIA. The new Decree of 2015 has introduced the categories of A+, A, B and C. Projects that are categorized as A+ require a full fledged EIA as well as an independent expert to advise on the quality of the EIA. Projects characterized as A require a full fledged EIA, category B projects a simplified EIA, and category C projects have to comply with General Procedures of Good Practice in Environmental Management. However, the new Decree stipulated that for the mining and oil sector specific environmental regulations apply. According to these specific regulations (Decree 56/2010, 34/2015, 31/2015) mining and oil projects cannot be classified as A+, but only as A, B or C projects. Also, the terms and conditions for biodiversity offsetting/counterbalancing are regulated in specific legislation (which is currently under consideration for approval).

Exemptions from EIA application

Describes any (groups of) activities identified in the regulation that are exempted from the requirement to do EIA (e.g. military or emergency activities).

Exempted are activities arising from emergency situations due to natural desasters or calamities, and activities related to state's secret national security. The central EIA authority has to provide appropriate guidelines and conduct audits in accordance with the legislation in force.

Institutional setting for EIA

to the top

Central EIA authority

Is there a central authority in charge of implementing EIA? Is it independent or linked to a higher body (e.g ministry)? What are its tasks related to EIA?

The Process of Environmental Impact Assessment (AIA) is managed on both national and provincial levels. Both levels have to ensure that the information of the Environmental Licenses is available to the public, they have to ensure public consultation and to hold public hearings. Both levels are also competent to involve legal mechanisms to stop EIA activities, or suspend certificates of environmental consultants.  

On a Central level, the authority (MITADER) has to guide, review and decide regarding the reports of A+ and A projects which include pre-feasibility studies, Terms of Reference, and the environmental impact assessment reports. They provide the Environmental Licenses for A+ and A projects and manage the involvement of the independent review specialists. For oil and gas projects, the AIA process has to be managed in collaboration between the Ministries of environment (MITADER) and Petroleum. More specifically, the Petroleum ministry has to participate in the reviewing of the EIAs, EAS, TdRs, and EDPAs by MITADER.

On a Provincial level, the MITADER authority has to guide, review and decide regarding the Terms of Reference for simplified environmental impact assessment studies, as well as the General Procedures of Good Practice in Environmental Management for C projects. Environmental management plans for mining projects of category B (e.g. small) are also approved on a Provincial level, in accordance with the Regulations for Mining Activities.

Other key (governmental) parties involved in EIA, and their roles

Lists other key parties (e.g. a review commission, knowledge institute) that have a role in many or all EIAs.

  • Multi-sector technical review committee. This committee is responsible for the review of the scoping document and the EIA report. It consists of at least one representative of DINAB; one representative of the sector ministry that represent the activity; one representative of the Environmental Fund (FUNAB); one representative of the local authority of the area where the activity is to take place; one (or more) representative(s) of government, education or research institutions related to the environment; and, if necessary, one (or more) expert(s) in the field of the respective activity, requested and contracted by MITADER.
  • AMAIA, the Mozambican Assossiation for EIA, aims to improve the quality of EIAs through capacity building of (public and private) professionals, and to safeguard that EIA contributes to sustainable development.
  • IMPFA, MITADER's training institute.
  • INM (National Mining Institute) has to manage the minimisation of environmental and social impacts in relation to small mining projects.

Mandate for exemption of EIA obligation

Describes if there is a legal mandate for a competent authority to make exemptions of EIA obligation. And if yes, under which conditions (e.g. national security, disasters or no conditions/when deemed necessary).

The law does not specify a mandate for any competent authority to make exemption of EIA obligation in a case by case bases. Exempted from EIA are activities arising from emergency situations and activities related to state's secret national security.

(De)centralisation of EIA mandates

Describes if EIA mandates are (de)centralised. Vertical decentralization refers to the extent to which the responsibility for EIA processes are delegated by the central government to the provincial or local authorities. Sectoral or horizontal decen

Decentralization is vertical. Decisions regarding EIAs for category B projects can also be taken at the provincial level, within the Provincial Directorates of MITADER.

EIA procedure

to the top

Overview EIA procedure

Characterizes the overall EIA procedure. If relevant, interesting aspects of the EIA procedure are mentioned such as: which procedural steps are part of the EIA procedure? How are they linked to each other? Are there different levels of assessment di

The first step of the EIA process in Mozambique is Screening, where the activities are categorized. It is then decided if they need a full, simplified or no EIA in order to receive the permit. Scoping is done for full EIAs and simplified EIAs. For simplified EIAs a pre-assessment is done during that stage. Further steps of the EIA process are the assessment, review and decision-making stage on whether an environmental licence is issued or not. Finally, compliance monitoring is undertaken.

Documents that can be essential outputs of the EIA process are the following: Starting documents (Screening), Environmental Pre-feasibility Study document for full EIAs (Scoping), ToR for full and simplified EIAs (Scoping), Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for full EIAs, Simplified Environmental Reports (SER) for simplified EIAs, recommendations from review, Environmental Licence, EMP.


Screening requirement and authority

Describes if a formal screening decision required, and if so, which authority is responsible for this decision. Is this decision published?

The Ministry for Land, the Environment and Rural Development (MITADER) is responsible for the screening decision.

Screening process

Describes the screening process: steps in screening, the stakeholders involved and outcomes of the process, status of screening advice of different stakeholders, etc. Also describes any prescribed methods for screening. If preliminary EIA's / light EIA's / Initial Environmental Evaluations (IEE) are done in this country and which criteria determine whether a preliminary or a full EIA is requested

Decree 54/2015 established that screening is required for all activities with possible impacts on the environment. The decision is based on several documents, including a description and justification of the activity, the legal framework of the activity, and a short description of the environmental and the socio-economic conditions of the area. In this stage, the authority may not approve the project when fatal issues are identified.

The screening results in the rejection of the activity's implementation, or in the categorization of the activity in one of four categories. Category A+ requires full fledged EIA and the supervision and review of an independent expert. Category A requires only a full fledged EIA. Category B a simplified EIA and Category C requires no EIA but compliance with General Procedures of Good Practice in Environmental Management.

The screening decision is based on several criteria, including: the number of affected people and communities; the type of ecosystems, plants and animals affected; location and extension of the affected area; probability, nature, duration, intensity, and significance of the impact; direct, indirect, potential, global and cumulative impacts; and reversibility and irreversibility of the impact. Decree 54/2015 provides  lists to determine the categories of the projects.

Category A+ comprises of projects that are of such complexity, magnitude, and likely to produce irreversible impacts, that they require strict monitoring with involvement of independent experts. They may involve economic and physical displacement that cannot be addressed under the specific Regulation on Resettlement Resulting From Economic Activities (Decree No. 31/2012, of 8 August), or they are positioned in areas characterized by highly valued biodiversity and habitats, animal and plants species on the edge of extinction, or may involve projects producing dangerous toxins (carcinogens), pesticides, and extraction and processing of minerals.

Category A are projects with significant impacts, for example large scale infrastructures (airports, highways), large-scale agriculture, forestry, fisheries and related industries.

Category B projects involve projects that have no significant impact and are not undertaken in sensitive areas, such as transmission lines, education complexes, and factories involving the production of various types of goods such as construction materials. Projects of Category B require the simplified EIA process including the formulation of ToR and of a Simplified Environmental Report (SER).

Category C projects may create minimal negative impacts, such as small-scale irrigation, telecommunication towers, or small factories.


Provision for sensitive areas

Are specific requirements formulated for environmentally sensitive areas? (e.g. no minimum thresholds, full EIA instead of partial EIA)

The Decree provides for the possibility to reject a project considering its fatal conditions. This can be applied to projects proposed in areas considered to be only for conversation purposes, and areas that contain species on the edge of extinction as well as migratory species, and to protect ecosystem functions essential on a national, provincial, or district level.


The Category A + provides extra protection for proposed projects in sensitive areas (both from an environmental and social concern).

Contents of the starting document

Describes the required content of the starting document (if any) that the proponent should submit to the competent authority for EIA screening. Mentions if the starting document is published.

Several documents have to be presented to the responsible authorities by the proponent, including: a) description of the activity; b) justification of the activity; c) the legal framework of the activity; d) short description of the biophysical and the socio-economic conditions of the area; e) current use of the land in the area where the activity is to take place; f) environmental information of the area where the activity is to take place; g) information on the elaboration and submission of the different steps of the EIA (ToR, scoping and EIA); h) duly completed form with preliminary environmental information as available DNAIA or at the provincial departments of MITADER.

Timeline Screening

Maximum number of (working) days allowed between submission of the starting document and the screening decision.

8 working days


Scoping requirement

Is a formal scoping step required as part of the EIA process?

All activities that fall under Category A or B require scoping, but to a different extent. For activities of Category A an Environmental Pre-Viability Study (EPDA) that also includes the designing of ToR has to be done. Activities in Category B only require Terms of References for the Simplified Environmental Report (SER), but no EPDA.

Scoping process

Describes who carries main responsibility to undertake scoping and what the roles and responsibilities of the involved parties during the process are. Specifically, is there independent formulation and/or review of the scoping document, approval of the scoping document? Are any methods prescribed, e.g. participation, checklists. What guidance is provided?

For activities in Category A+ and A: Proponent is reponsible for writting the EPDA, the scoping document that includes a ToR for the EIA. An essential aspect is that the proponent identifies the likelihood of fatal issues. Also, for A+, A and B projects public participation is obligatory.

The EPDA report is reviewed by a multi-sector technical review committee. The technical committee reviews the scoping report of A+, A and B projects. It provides comments and asks for additional information to the proponent when regarded necessary.

Contents of the scoping document

Explains if there are there specific requirements for the content of the scoping document, and if so, what these are.

Three different Scoping documents can be distinguished: the EPDA report, the ToR for Category A+ and A activities and the ToR for Category B activities.

The EPDA consists of:

  • a non-technical summary;
  • name and address of the proponent as well as of the multi-disciplinary team elaborating the EIA;
  • delineation of the areas on which the project has indirect influence;
  • patterns of land use for the areas on which the project has direct and indirect influence;
  • description of the activity and its foreseen interventions, as well as possible alternatives for the different stages of the activity (plan, construction, exploration, and disabling);
  • biophysical and socio-economic description of the area;
  • identification and review of the fatal issues of the activity;
  • indication of the potential environmental impacts of the activity;
  • identification and description of the aspects that should be researched in detail during the EIA.
  • a report of the public participation.

A Review report of the independent Experts on the EPDA and EIA of Category A+


The ToR for category A+ and A projects consists of:

  • a description of the needed in depth studies as identified in the EPDA;
  • a description of the viable alternatives that need further research during EIA;
  • methodology for identification and review of the possible environmental impact during the different stages of the activity;
  • name and address of the proponent as well as of the multi-disciplinary team elaborating the EIA;
  • necessary additional information requirements.

The ToR for category B activities requires the following contents:

  • name and address of the proponent; - delineation of the areas on which the project has direct and indirect influence (including map);
  • patterns of land use in the areas of the project;
  • analysis of how the activity fits into the existing spatial plans;
  • description of the activity and its foreseen interventions, as well as possible alternatives for the different stages of the activity (plan, construction, exploration, and disabling);
  • public participation plan;
  • identification of the environmental issues at stake in the EIA;
  • description of the methodologies to be used in the identification, classification and review of the environmental impacts of the proposed activity and alternatives;
  • name and address of the multi-disciplinary team elaborating the EIA.
Timeline scoping

Number of (working) days for the decision on approval of the scoping document by the competent authority.

ToR for B projects: 15 working days

EPDA and ToR for A projects: 30 working days

EPDA and ToR for A+ projects: between 40 and 50 working days

Assessment and reporting

Assessment process

Steps and roles of stakeholders in the assessment and status of the input of the stakeholders. Also sets out methods for assessment of the environmental impacts of the activity, if prescribed, and whether the assessment covers environmental, social, economic and/or transboundary effects.

The Proponent is responsible for the assessment process. The EIA is guided by the approved ToR that is established during the scoping stage. The methods of the assessment undertaken in the EIA had to be specified in the ToR. The EIA and simplified reports have to be submitted to MITADER.

Contents of the EIA report

Explains what should be contained in the EIA report. Specifies if a potential Environmental Management Plan is part of the EIA report or if it is a separate document that contributes to the EIA process.

The EIA for Category A+ and A activities, requires the following content:

  • non-technical summary;
  • legal framework;
  • analysis of how the activity fits into the existing spatial plans;
  • description of the activity and its foreseen interventions, as well as possible alternatives for the different stages of the activity (plan, construction, exploration, and disabling);
  • geographical delineation of the project;
  • baseline data of the socio-economic, and natural environment in the area under influence of the activity;
  • detailed description and comparison of the different alternatives and the predicted future for the environmental and socio-eonomic situation, with and without mitigation measures;
  • identification and review of environmental and social impacts of the activity and its mitigation measurements;
  • identification of impacts on health, affected communities including vulnerable groups, and proposed mitigation measures;
  • environmental and social management plan that includes a monitoring plan, an environmental education program, and contingency plans for accidents;
  • in a separate attachment, the management plan for biodiversity counterbalancing, when applicable;
  • in a seperate attachment, a report of the physical, social and economic losses identified, as well as a Resettlement Plan in line with the National Directive, and a report of the public participation that informs affected peoples about resettlement and includes a discussion of alternative resettlement areas;
  • name and address of the multi-disciplinary team elaborating the EIA;
  • public participation report.

Specialist reports must be attached to the EIA report in the form of appendices.

For Category A + an independent advisory report has to be submitted.

The Simplified Environmental Report (SER) for Category B activities is required to have the following contents:

  • non-technical summary;
  • description of the activity and its geographical location;
  • legal framework;
  • analysis of how the activity fits into the existing spatial plans;
  • short description of the baseline environmental situation in the area under influence of the activity;
  • identification and review of environmental impacts of the activity;
  • environmental management plan that includes a monitoring plan, an environmental education program, and contingency plans for accidents;
  • name and address of the multi-disciplinary team elaborating the EIA;
  • public participation report.


Review process

Overview of the review process, including: steps in the process and roles of the stakeholders, status of the input of the stakeholders. Is the process open to public? Review method: internal review, external review, panel/commission (permanent or temporary), are the review results documented? Are the review criteria general or case by case? Are the review results documented? Is a potential review

A temporary multi-sector technical review committee is set up to review the EPDA. The same committee also reviews the EIA report. The committee submits a report with its comments to the EIA authority (MITADER), which also takes into account all the comments made by the public during the review process. For A+ projects, the review report of the independent expert is included.  

During the review process, the proponent may have to submit additional information to assist the committee. The proponent has 10 working days to comply with these requests. The findings of the report of the committee form the basis for the decision-making process taken by the MITADER regarding the granting of the Environmental License.
The review of the Simplified Environmental Report (SER) entails the set up of a technical committee comprising of various (local) representatives and technical experts. This committee may request additional information, and eventually approves the SER which is the fundament for the approval of the Environmental License.

Review expertise

Describes if the EIA is checked by external parties, and if so to what extent these represent required disciplines/expertise. Also sets out if measures have been taken to ensure that reviewers are impartial?

Through the review committee relevant expertise from within government can be involved in the review.

Timeline Review

Number of (working) days for review of the EIA by the competent authority.

45 working days EIA A projects

60 working days EIA for A+ projects

30 working days simplified EIA for B projects


Integration of EIA into decision-making

Describes what kind of decision-making processes the EIA is intended to support. We look specifically at the decision on EIA approval, and how this relates to envirionmental approval for the project, and other project approval decisions (permits) needed before a project can proceed. This category describes which decisions are influenced by EIA and how they are linked to each other.

There are three phases of licensing:

1) a temporary license after approval of the EPDA (valid for 2 years).

2) a license for installation of the project, after de EIA and the resettlement plan (if applicable) are approved (valid for 2 years).

3) an operational license when there is full compliance with the EIA and full completion of the Resettlement plan (if applicable) (valid for 5 years).


The review committee provides recommendations to the competent authority regarding the issuing of the Environmental Licence. The issuance of the Environmental Licence must be based upon an approved EIA of the proposed activity. Environmental Licences are valid for a period of five years. They are then renewable for an equal period of time. The licence is a prerequisite for the issuance of any other licence or permit that may be legally required. The decision on the EIA approval and the issuance of the license are both taken by the central EIA authority.

Competent authority

Describes which authority/authorities is/are responsible for each of the main decision-making processes on EIA (EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval). It is explained if those decisions are taken by the same or different authorities.

MITADER is the competent authority for activities of Category A+ and A, and its provincial departments may issue the licence for Category B and C projects.  

Decision documents

Mentions if the decision (on EIA approval and/or environmental approval) is linked to certain documents (e.g. environmental management plan, permit conditions) in order to facilitate the management of environmental risks during project implementation. Also describes if commitments of the proponent are incorporated into legally binding instruments.

Not specified

Decision justification

Sets out requirements for justification of the consideration of the EIA information in decision-making (on EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval).

If environmental viability is proven, the competent authority notifies the proponent after payment of all required fees. It is not specified if this is writing or not. If environmental viability is not guaranteed, the competent authority can (partially) reject the implementation of the activity, which is reasoned both technically and legally in a final statement report.

The partial rejection can result in placing the project in another category. In this case, the Authority requires that a new AIA process is conducted, before they reconsider their decision.

Decision publication

Does the decision (on EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval) have to be published? Also, is the decision justification published as well?

Not specified.

Timeline decision-making

Maximum number of (working) days available to the competent authority to make the EIA based decision (EIA approval, environmental clearance and/or project approval).

If environmental viability is proven, competent authority has 15 working days to notify proponent after payment of all required fees. If environmental viability is not guaranteed, the competent authority can (partially) reject the implementation of the activity. If that is the case, competent authority has 5 working days to notify the proponent.

Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement

Compliance monitoring

Is compliance monitoring required to check if the project is implemented as described in the EIA documents and/or if mitigation of environmental impacts complies with applicable standards and other measures set out in the EIA documents? Who is responsible for ensuring compliance? How does this authority ensure compliance (for example, through inspections)? And what requirements are there for the p

The Decree stipulates that MITADER has to conduct regular inspections on the sites of projects to monitor the implementation of the management plans. They can also request an environmental audit when they regard this necessary.

Specifically for A+ and A projects, the Authority has to visit the project on an annual basis during the construction phase.  

Every five years the Environmental Licence has to be renewed. The renewal of the licence depends on the presentation of an updated EMP for Category A and B projects, and for Category C a report on environmental performance based on the conditions set out in the authorisation document. For Category A+ projects also an updated management plan for counterbalancing impacts on biodiversity is expected.

MITADER will conduct a visit to the locality of the project, for which the costs are the entire responsibility of the proponent.

External monitoring

Are there monitoring requirements that involve external parties, such as citizen monitoring (for example, through a complaints procedure), or third party auditing?

Not specified

Non-compliance penalties

Are there penalties that the authority responsible for compliance can apply if environmental conditions are not met? What are these? (for example, fines, suspension of license)

Penalties are set out as follows:

  • Administrative offences are penalized with a fine of 30 to 150 minimum wages, as well as the imposition of any other sanction  provided for in the law.
  • Failure to renew the Environmental Licence (every 5 years) is fined with 30 to 50 minimum wages, and suspencion of the activity until a new license is issued.
  • When projects are not implemented in accordance with the license: 2857 to 5714 minimal wages for A+ projects, 1429 to 2857 minimal wages for A projects, 286 to 1429 minimal wages for B projects, and 1 to 2 minimal wages for C projects, and immediate suspencion.
  • Other offences related to EIA are listed, for example a fine of 25 million MT (meticais) when the proponent does not follow the established deadlines of the AIA process.
EIA evaluation

Are there any requirements to monitor if the impacts in reality are as they were predicted in the EIA, with the purpose of evaluating the EIA itself and improving future EIA practice?

Not specified

Payment system

Is the proponent required to pay a fee when applying for an EIA? Is this fee linked to a permitting fee, or separate? If yes, when is this paid and to whom (to the agency that issues the license or to a central agency)?

All proponents pay an initial fee of 100000 MT.

Depending on the category of the project, subsequent fees have to be paid.

For Category A+ a fee of 0.30% of the value of the investment.

For Catergory A and B a fee of 0.20% of the value of the investment.

For Category C a fee of 0.02% of the value of the investment above MT.

The request for payment should be accompanied with an actualized environmental management plan, which is in compliance with environmental legislation.

Public participation

Public participation requirements for EIA process stages

Describes for which of the EIA process stages public participation is required.

Public participation is mandatory for Category A+, A and B projects. Public participation is required from the start of the conceptual phase of the project, until the EIA (or simplified) approval has been given.

Public participation is regarded to be the entire responsibility of the proponent. Public participation must at least include 2 consultations on a local level; the first consultation must entail a presentation of the proposed project and involves collection of comments and suggestions, and the second consultation must involve presenting of the report to be submitted to the government (supposedly the first version of the EPDA and/or EIAs). The announcement for the public consultation must be done at least 15 days in advance of the event.

All parties, and specifically local communities whom are directly or indirectly affected by the project can take place in the consultation.

All the technical reports in relation to the scoping of the project must be available to the public before the public consultation, to guarantee their participation in the process.

The final reports including the EIA, environmental and social management plans, management plans of counterbalancing biodiversity, and the resettlement plans are public documents. The EIA Authority is responsible for disseminating these documents on a national and provincial level.

Regarding resettlement of local communities, specific consultation requirements apply (see the Process of Resettlement Resulting from Economic Activities (Decree No. 31/2012, of 8 August).





Public participation guidance

Has any guidance on participation been provided?

There is a General Policy for Public Participation in EIA (Ministerial Decree 130/2006 of 19 July) wich includes methodology and procedural guidance and principles.

Access to information

Which of the information that is generated in the EIA process is available to the public? Specifically, which reports and decision statements?

During public consultation, all information that is related to the activity should be made available. If needed, this information should be transcribed to a easy to understand, clear and concise language. This includes the possible environmental, social and economic impacts of the activity, the decisions that can be taken, and the alternatives. The technical reports of the EIA report must also be made available for public comment.

Information dissemination

How can the public receive the information that is publicly available? Are there public announcement on the proceedings? How/where are these published? Is information made available locally? Is information sent on request? etc.

During public consultation, information is made available in public places and distributed through media organizations with the largest coverage and circulation in the area where the activity is to take place. No specifications are made about information dissemination during public hearings. However, public hearings are announced through the same media organization.

Timeline for public comments

The number of (working) days available for the public to make comments on the EIA decision document.

For Category A+ projects, 45 days after de Public Consultation was held, and comments should be directed to the consultant responsible for the project.


For the other categories, 15 days after de Public Consultation was held, and comments should be directed to the consultant responsible for the project.

Costs for public

Are there any specified costs public parties will incur if they partake in EIA?(e.g. costs for the receiving report, costs of losing an appeal, etc. Costs associated with travel to meetings or such are not included here)

Not specified

Public comments

What options do the public have to provide their comments. Should comments be written, or may they also be verbal? To which agency should they provide their submissions?

All comments provided during public consultation and public hearings should be registered in such a way that the integrity of its contents are preserved (written, recorded, other). The public participation must result in a final report (this report will be public).

Public comments in decision-making

Do the EIA and/or project approval decisions have to be justified on the basis of public participation results? Do legal texts indicate how public participation results should be used and to which decision-making processses they should contribute?

Not specified

Legal recourse

Possibilities for appeal

What are the legal recourse options to challenge EIA decisions are provided for within the legal framework?

Not specified

Decisions that can be appealed

Which EIA decisions can be appealed?

Not specified

Who can appeal

Who can make an appeal (in other words, has legal standing)?

Not specified

EIA practice

to the top

Practice reviews

Any EIA practice review studies that have been done (by governmental agencies or others) are listed here. Where relevant, links to studies are included, and the main conclusions of the studies are summarised.

No information

Accreditation of consultants

Is there and accreditation system operational in the country to certify consultants to do EIAs?

Individual consultants, consulting firms, or consortiums can be involved in the impact assessment process and studies. They can only be registered when they have five year or more experience in the area of the environment, or in specific subjects related to the environment. The Decree provides a list of criteria Mozambican consultants need to comply with.

For foreign consultancies involved in the project, the Decree requires that 50 % of the consultants are subcontracted Mozambican nationals.

There is no specific information yet regarding the requirements of Independent Experts for Category A+ projects.

Professional bodies

Professional bodies relevant to EIA practice in the country, such as EIA Associations, Environmental Expert Associations, etc are listed here.

AMAIA is the Mozambican Association of Environmental Impact Assessment

Non-governmental EIA guidance

Lists any EIA manuals and good practice publications (including checklists, case studies) that have been published by parties other than government.

No information

Capacity development

Ongoing training programmes (including professional and academic training) and major training events held in the past (with focus on recent events) are mentioned here.

Institutional capacity development programme with MICOA (now MITADER) and the Danish International Development Administration (DANIDA) from 2006-2010.

EIA links

to the top

Other relevant links on EIA

Any other relevant links (for example to country specific guidance documents) are included here.

SAIEA Website on Mozambique