Kenya

Profile General | EIA profile | SEA profile
See also Webpages (16) | Projects (2) | Library (11)

EIA profile

Updated to: 25 February 2015

Download as PDF

EIA background

to the top

Country contact on EIA

Contact details for the country contact on EIA.

National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA)
P.O.BOX 67839-00200 Nairobi Popo Road off Mombasa Road
NAIROBI, KENYA 
Tel: (+254)-020-605522/6/7
Fax: (+254)-020-608997 
Mobile: 0724 - 253 398/0728-585 829/0735-013 046/0735-010 237
Wireless: 020-2101370, Hotline: 606041
E-mail: dgnema@nema.go.ke
Website: www.nema.go.ke

History of EIA

Brief description of the history of the EIA system in the country, including when it was introduced and any major milestones in its development.

In the late 1970’s, the Kenyan government committed to improving environmental impact assessments . By then, the National Environment Secretariat (NES) in Kenya already viewed environmental impact assessment as a key tool for meeting its environmental protection objectives, but there was a lack of proper legal basis for EIA and NES was ineffective in enforcing the practice of EIA. This prompted the formation of Inter-Ministerial Committee on the Environment (IMCE). The IMCE provided NES with the ability to co-opt Committee members and use the legislative mandates of those members to require EIA application for industrial projects. In the 1990s, this approach was still considered insufficiently effective and EIA was given legal status and more recognition by incorporation into the Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA). This Act became effective on 14th January 2000. Subsequent to the Act, Environmental Impact Assessment and Audit Regulations  (EIAAR, 2002) and Environmental Impact  Assessment Guidelines and Administrative Procedures (EIAGAP, 2003) were formulated to guide the EIA process.

Year of introduction of EIA legislation

NB: this field is only meant for the world map. It is a hidden cell that is not published on the website. If available, mention the year when detailed national EIA regulations were issued. If such regulations do not exist and if EIA practice is base

1999

Legal framework for EIA

to the top

Year of introduction of enabling law

Year when the enabling law for EIA was issued

The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act (1999)

1999

Approving authority of enabling law

Authority that approved the enabling law for EIA.

Parliament

Year of introduction of first national detailed regulation for EIA

Year when when the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.

The Environmental Impact Assessment and Audit Regulations (2002) set supplementing requirements for the EIA procedure, responsibilities and the contents of the EIA report.

2002

Approving authority of first national detailed regulation for EIA

The authority that approved the first national detailed regulation (procedural requirements) through which EIA was operationalized.

The Minister of Environment.

Recent updates and additions to the EIA legislation

Revisions of the EIA provisions in the enabling law or the national detailed EIA regulation (procedural requirements) are named. The year is listed, and the main changes since the first regulation are mentioned, if available. Also, additional EIA-re

The Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations have been revised in 2003. They further have been amended in 2007 and in 2009.

Sector specific procedures or regulations on EIA

Any existing sectoral procedural or content regulations are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each.

The Water management regulations specifically refer to the EIA requirement for activities likely to have any adverse impacts on water quality or quantity.

Guidelines

Any government issued guidelines on EIA (general, or sectoral) are listed here, as well as the authority that issued each. Describe the legal status of the guidelines.

Objective of EIA

The objective of EIA as stated in the above described legal basis.

The EIA and audit regulations do not specify any objectives. However, the 2002 EIA guidelines state that the EIA objective is to ensure that environmental concerns are integrated in all development activities in order to contribute to sustainable development. More specifically, the objectives as stated in the guidelines are: 

  • To identify potential environmental impacts of proposed projects, policies, plans and programmes;
  • To assess the significance of these impacts;
  • To assess the relative importance of the impacts of alternative plans, designs and sites;
  • To propose mitigation measures for the significant negative impacts of the project on the environment;
  • To generate baseline data for monitoring and evaluation of how well the mitigation measures are being implemented during the  project cycle;
  • To present information on the impact of alternatives;
  • To present results of the EIA in such a way that they can guide informed decision-making.

Scope of EIA application

Describes which types of activities require EIA (public and/or private activities; national and/or foreign initiated project; or all such projects)

All activities (public, private, national and international) specified in the Second Schedule of EMCA 1999 require EIA.

Exemptions from EIA application

Describes any (groups of) activities identified in the regulation that are exempted from the requirement to do EIA (e.g. military or emergency activities).

There are no specific provisions for exemptions.

Institutional setting for EIA

to the top

Central EIA authority

Is there a central authority in charge of implementing EIA? Is it independent or linked to a higher body (e.g ministry)? What are its tasks related to EIA?

NEMA is the central EIA authority. It operates under the National Environmental Council, which falls under the Ministry of Environment. The law provides for consultation on EIA with lead agencies, District and Provincial Environment Committees on EIA matters. Depending on the project, NEMA may form a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) with a specific mandate to give advice on a particular project.

Other key (governmental) parties involved in EIA, and their roles

Lists other key parties (e.g. a review commission, knowledge institute) that have a role in many or all EIAs.

  • Lead Agencies: These may be a government ministry, department, parastatal (a fully or partially state-owned government agency), state corporation or local authority responsible for control or management of any element of the environment or natural resource. They may be requested by NEMA to comment on the application document and the EIA report. 
  • Provincial Environment Committees (PEC) and District Environment Committees (DEC): Local level committees consulted during decision-making.  
  • The Standard Enforcement Review Committee: This committee advises competent authority on standards of water quality, air quality, emissions of noise, pollution and radiation. The committee in consultation with NEMA vets expert (s) for EIA practice. It may advise NEMA to revoke, suspend or cancel a license where the licensee contravenes the provisions of the license.
  • National Environmental Tribunal: Comprised of a judge, an advocate of the high court, an environmental lawyer and two academics and functions to hear disputes of a technical nature on the administration of the EMCA as well as appeals against the administrative decision taken by NEMA and other organisations responsible for enforcement of the EMCA and the regulations issued under the EMCA. 
  • High Court: Is the highest appeal authority that receives, analyse, approves or disapproves appeals on decisions made by the National Environmental Tribunal. 

Mandate for exemption of EIA obligation

Describes if there is a legal mandate for a competent authority to make exemptions of EIA obligation. And if yes, under which conditions (e.g. national security, disasters or no conditions/when deemed necessary).

There are no specific grounds for EIA exemptions.

(De)centralisation of EIA mandates

Describes if EIA mandates are (de)centralised. Vertical decentralization refers to the extent to which the responsibility for EIA processes are delegated by the central government to the provincial or local authorities. Sectoral or horizontal decen

Decision making is centralised. NEMA decides on all EIAs centrally, but has to consult with Provincial and District level Committees for decision-making on EIA (to be confirmed with NEMA).

EIA procedure

to the top

Overview EIA procedure

Characterizes the overall EIA procedure. If relevant, interesting aspects of the EIA procedure are mentioned such as: which procedural steps are part of the EIA procedure? How are they linked to each other? Are there different levels of assessment di

The key elements in the EIA process include:
1)   Screening: Development and submission of a Project Report
2)   Scoping: drawing-up of Terms of Reference (TOR) for the study
3)   Assessment: Gathering of baseline information through investigation/ research
4)   Review of EIA Study Report by the Authority and relevant lead agencies
5)   Decision on EIA Study Report leading to a decision on the issuance on the EIA licence
6)   Monitoring and Auditing of the project

 

The following documents are essential outcomes of the EIA process: Project Report (Screening), Terms of Reference (Scoping), EIA report, EIA licence, Environmental Audit Reports, Monitoring Reports.

Screening

Screening requirement and authority

Describes if a formal screening decision required, and if so, which authority is responsible for this decision. Is this decision published?

NEMA decides, on the basis of the initial environmental assessment, if a full EIA is required.

Screening process

Describes the screening process: steps in screening, the stakeholders involved and outcomes of the process, status of screening advice of different stakeholders, etc. Also describes any prescribed methods for screening. If preliminary EIA's / light EIA's / Initial Environmental Evaluations (IEE) are done in this country and which criteria determine whether a preliminary or a full EIA is requested

The second schedule of the EMCA comprises of a list of projects to undergo EIA. If a project is on the list, the proponent is required to submit an initial project assessment report (prepared by a registered EIA expert) that contains an initial assessment of environmental effects. Use of checklists, matrices, threshold limits and overlays in preparing an Initial Environmental Assessment are suggested in the EIA guidelines, but no specific details are given.

On the website of NEMA a screening list of projects is provided.

Provision for sensitive areas

Are specific requirements formulated for environmentally sensitive areas? (e.g. no minimum thresholds, full EIA instead of partial EIA)

There are provisions under the EMCA for protection of sensitive areas. Projects that have an effect on sensitive areas must undergo a full EIA.

Contents of the starting document

Describes the required content of the starting document (if any) that the proponent should submit to the competent authority for EIA screening. Mentions if the starting document is published.

The EIA regulations stipulate that the initial project assessment report should contain information on: 

i) the nature of the project;
ii) the location of the project;
iii) activities of the project during construction, operation and decommissioning phases;
iv) the design of the projects;
v) the materials to be used, products and by-products, including waste generated and the methods of their disposal;
vi) impacts and mitigation measures;       
vii) an action plan for the prevention and management of possible accidents during the projects cycle; 
viii) a plan to ensure the health and safety of the workers and neighbouring communities;
ix) the economic and socio-cultural impacts to the local community and the nation in general’
x) the projects budget; and
xi) any other information that NEMA may require.

Timeline Screening

Maximum number of (working) days allowed between submission of the starting document and the screening decision.

NEMA has 45 days to decide whether a full EIA is necessary or whether the project can be licensed on the bais of the initial assessment (the timeline can be varied by NEMA depending on the time needed to solve contentious issues).

Scoping

Scoping requirement

Is a formal scoping step required as part of the EIA process?

Once it has been decided that a full EIA is needed, scoping is a mandatory step with specified requirements. The proponent is responsible for scoping (registered experts may prepare the EIA report on behalf of the proponent).

Scoping process

Describes who carries main responsibility to undertake scoping and what the roles and responsibilities of the involved parties during the process are. Specifically, is there independent formulation and/or review of the scoping document, approval of the scoping document? Are any methods prescribed, e.g. participation, checklists. What guidance is provided?

The main part of the scoping exercise is the development of the Terms of Reference (ToR) by the proponent, in consultation with the lead agencies and NEMA. The EIA guidelines suggest the development of a communication plan and continual consultation especially with the potentially affected persons. NEMA , in consultation with the lead agencies, approves the ToR.

Contents of the scoping document

Explains if there are there specific requirements for the content of the scoping document, and if so, what these are.

The final result of scoping process is the Terms of References for the EIA. These have to be formally approved. The EIA guideline stipulates that the ToR is meant to focus on key issues of concern identified during the scoping exercise, including, but not limited to:

i) Impacts on flora, fauna, soils, air and water;
ii) Legislation and institutional framework relation;
iii) Proposed activities;
iv) Proposed (possible) mitigation measures;
v) Proposed Environmental Management Plan;
vi) Details of experts to do the proposed EIA Study and study schedules;
vii) Details of the total project implementation costs;
viii) Modalities for environmental Audit and Monitoring;
ix) Identification of sources of baseline information and information gaps.

Timeline scoping

Number of (working) days for the decision on approval of the scoping document by the competent authority.

Not specified

Assessment and reporting

Assessment process

Steps and roles of stakeholders in the assessment and status of the input of the stakeholders. Also sets out methods for assessment of the environmental impacts of the activity, if prescribed, and whether the assessment covers environmental, social, economic and/or transboundary effects.

The main steps for the EIA study, as outlined in the EIA regulations and the EIA guidelines, are: 

  1. Assembling of the team of experts;
  2. Examining the ToRs for each expert (assigning responsibilities to each member of the team, specifying who the lead expert responsible for the study is, agreeing on time schedules);
  3. Plan field work including consultations and public participation (collection of baseline data and information, awareness creation, generation of primary data, ecological, socio-cultural and economic surveys, designing of EMP to implement the mitigation measures and involving all the affected persons);  
  4. Report writing. 

For the impact assessment, environmental effects as well as social and cultural effects are considered.

Contents of the EIA report

Explains what should be contained in the EIA report. Specifies if a potential Environmental Management Plan is part of the EIA report or if it is a separate document that contributes to the EIA process.

Required contents include a description of:

i) location;
ii) legislative and baseline information reference;
iii) objectives;
iv) technology, procedure & process to be used;
v) materials for project construction and implementation;
vi) products, by-products and waste to be generated;
vii) description of potentially affected environment;
viii) environmental effects;
viii) alternatives;
ix) Environmental Management Plan;
x) action plan for prevention and management of foreseeable accidents and hazardous activities;
xi) knowledge gaps;
xii) economic and social analysis and;
xiii) a non-technical summary.

Review

Review process

Overview of the review process, including: steps in the process and roles of the stakeholders, status of the input of the stakeholders. Is the process open to public? Review method: internal review, external review, panel/commission (permanent or temporary), are the review results documented? Are the review criteria general or case by case? Are the review results documented? Is a potential review

The proponent submits the EIA report to NEMA, who forwards it to the relevant Agencies. These Lead Agencies review the report against the ToR and relay their comments to NEMA. NEMA, at the expense of the proponent, provides the report to the public and invites them to submit comments.  If there are outstanding issues after the review of the comments received (both written and oral), NEMA may decide to hold a public hearing. Depending on the case, a Technical Advisory Committee may be established to advise NEMA on the quality and content of the EIA report.

An overview of the review process can be found here.

Review expertise

Describes if the EIA is checked by external parties, and if so to what extent these represent required disciplines/expertise. Also sets out if measures have been taken to ensure that reviewers are impartial?

Expert input in the review is organised through the involvement of the Technical Advisory Committee that consists of not less than 5 multi-disciplinary specialists. Anyone who wishes to review the EIA report can apply to NEMA to inspect the EIA report.

Timeline Review

Number of (working) days for review of the EIA by the competent authority.

NEMA is required, within 14 days of receiving the EIA report, to invite the lead agents and the public  to give comments. Within 3 months of receiving the EIA report, NEMA has to take a decision on the report.

Decision-making

Integration of EIA into decision-making

Describes what kind of decision-making processes the EIA is intended to support. We look specifically at the decision on EIA approval, and how this relates to envirionmental approval for the project, and other project approval decisions (permits) needed before a project can proceed. This category describes which decisions are influenced by EIA and how they are linked to each other.

The approval of the EIA report leads to a decision on the issuing of an environmental impact assment licence. Whether a licence is granted or not is  based on the following criteria:
- Validity of environmental impact study report
- Comments made by affected parties
- Public hearing report
- any other information the REMA may require

Such a licence is required before other licences (trading, commercial or development) can be issued. EIA approval and project approval are thus two separate decisions taken by different competent authorities.

Competent authority

Describes which authority/authorities is/are responsible for each of the main decision-making processes on EIA (EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval). It is explained if those decisions are taken by the same or different authorities.

NEMA takes the decision on the environmental impact study report approval as well as on the issuing of the environmental impact assessment licence.

Decision documents

Mentions if the decision (on EIA approval and/or environmental approval) is linked to certain documents (e.g. environmental management plan, permit conditions) in order to facilitate the management of environmental risks during project implementation. Also describes if commitments of the proponent are incorporated into legally binding instruments.

Terms and conditions are formulated for the environmental impact assessment licence.

Decision justification

Sets out requirements for justification of the consideration of the EIA information in decision-making (on EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval).

NEMA's decision and the reasons are communicated in writing to the proponent. Besides the validity of the EIA report, the EIA regulations state that NEMA should take into consideration the comments made by the lead agency and other interested parties, the report of the presiding officer compiled during public hearing, and other factors which the NEMA considers crucial in the implementation of the project.

Decision publication

Does the decision (on EIA approval, environmental approval and/or project approval) have to be published? Also, is the decision justification published as well?

The decision of NEMA is communicated to the proponent within fourteen days from the date of the decision. A copy of the decision is made available for inspection at NEMA's offices, and can be viewing by anyone who wishes to do so, upon payment of a prescribed fee.

Timeline decision-making

Maximum number of (working) days available to the competent authority to make the EIA based decision (EIA approval, environmental clearance and/or project approval).

Within 90 days of receiving the EIA report.

Monitoring, Compliance and Enforcement

Compliance monitoring

Is compliance monitoring required to check if the project is implemented as described in the EIA documents and/or if mitigation of environmental impacts complies with applicable standards and other measures set out in the EIA documents? Who is responsible for ensuring compliance? How does this authority ensure compliance (for example, through inspections)? And what requirements are there for the p

Monitoring and auditing are a mandatory requirement under the EMCA for all activities that are likely to have significant environmental consequences. 
The proponent is required do self audits of a project for which an EIA study report has been made, keep accurate records and make annual audit reports to NEMA describing to what degree the project conforms with the EIA study report. The proponent is also required to take all responsible measures to mitigate any undesirable effects not contemplated in the EIA study report and keep records of the same. Self audits can be carried out by external auditors commissioned by the proponent as long as the auditors are registered with NEMA.

External monitoring

Are there monitoring requirements that involve external parties, such as citizen monitoring (for example, through a complaints procedure), or third party auditing?

NEMA can decide to carry out a control audit and may carry out inspections from time to time.

Non-compliance penalties

Are there penalties that the authority responsible for compliance can apply if environmental conditions are not met? What are these? (for example, fines, suspension of license)

NEMA can suspend or require an update of an EIA license at any time after issuing it. This can occur if: 

  • there is a substantial change or modification in the project or in the manner in which the project is being operated;
  • the project poses environmental threat which could not be reasonably foreseen at the time of the study, evaluation or review; or 
  • it is established that the information or data given by the proponent in support of his application for an EIA license is false, inaccurate or intended to mislead.
EIA evaluation

Are there any requirements to monitor if the impacts in reality are as they were predicted in the EIA, with the purpose of evaluating the EIA itself and improving future EIA practice?

There are requirements to assess the actual impacts of the project for corrective actions in case major unpredicted impacts occur. However, there is no mentioning of the purpose of evaluating EIA itself and of improving future EIA practice with it.

Payment system

Is the proponent required to pay a fee when applying for an EIA? Is this fee linked to a permitting fee, or separate? If yes, when is this paid and to whom (to the agency that issues the license or to a central agency)?

The proponent pays a set fee of 0.1% of the project cost to NEMA or the appointed agent in the District where the project is to be undertaken, for processing of the EIA.

Public participation

Public participation requirements for EIA process stages

Describes for which of the EIA process stages public participation is required.

There are provisions for public participation in the EMCA and in the EIA and audit regulations. The EIA guidelines state that public participation should be a part of the screening, scoping and review of EIA report. The proponent is responsible for collecting the views of the public during these stages. Additionally, the EMCA requires public participation in the review of the EIA report. 

Public participation arrangements

Relevant information regarding the arrangements for public participation are provided here (e.g. who is responsible for it, who is consulted, does the legislation mention consultation or participation, for which project should consultations be held, are public hearings held etc.)

During the screening phase, the possibly affected people have to be informed about the project and consulted for their concerns. The views of the public shall then be incorporated into the project report used for screening.

According to the EIA guidelines, public consultation in the scoping phase can involve the following methods:

  • Securing written submissions by Lead Agencies and the public
  • Public opinion
  • Community meetings and public hearings
  • Preliminary field studies/site visits
  • Workshops/seminars
  • Establishing inter-sector task forces

During the review process, the EIA report is made available to the public. To a minimum, the public has to be able to submit written reactions to the EIA, but a public hearing may be held if NEMA deems this necessary. The outcomes of the public hearing are recorded by a qualified person and are submitted for consideration in the final decision. A member of the public can, after showing reasonable cause in writing, petition NEMA to carry out an EIA audit.

Public participation guidance

Has any guidance on participation been provided?

There are no specific manuals for public participation, but the EIA guidelines provide some guidance on consultation and public participation.

Access to information

Which of the information that is generated in the EIA process is available to the public? Specifically, which reports and decision statements?

The public can access and assess information registers at NEMA upon application.  Such information may include:

i) Project report;
ii) EIA study report;
iii) Environmental Monitoring Report;
iv) Record of Decision for EIA approval;
v) Licenses for project report;
vi) Licenses for EIA;
vii) Data base for EIA firms and experts.

Information dissemination

How can the public receive the information that is publicly available? Are there public announcement on the proceedings? How/where are these published? Is information made available locally? Is information sent on request? etc.

Information is disseminated through Kenya Gazette notice, local newspaper, internet (limited) and local radio stations (both in local and national languages). It is the responsibility of the proponent to ensure effective distribution of the EIA study report information to the affected persons to avoid unnecessary delays in decision-making and project implementation.

Timeline for public comments

The number of (working) days available for the public to make comments on the EIA decision document.

90 days

Costs for public

Are there any specified costs public parties will incur if they partake in EIA?(e.g. costs for the receiving report, costs of losing an appeal, etc. Costs associated with travel to meetings or such are not included here)

To inspect the register of EIA licenses issued, any person wishing to do so requires to pay a prescribed fee of Ksh 200 per register (approx USD2).

Public comments

What options do the public have to provide their comments. Should comments be written, or may they also be verbal? To which agency should they provide their submissions?

Comments can be made in writing by any member of the public. In a public hearing, oral and written comments are recorded by a NEMA presiding officer for further transmission and consideration in the final decision.

Public comments in decision-making

Do the EIA and/or project approval decisions have to be justified on the basis of public participation results? Do legal texts indicate how public participation results should be used and to which decision-making processses they should contribute?

Evidence of public involvement during the EIA study has to be included in the EIA study report and consideration of comments made by the public is required before decision is made.

Legal recourse

Possibilities for appeal

What are the legal recourse options to challenge EIA decisions are provided for within the legal framework?

There are legal recourse options. The Public Complaints Committee is an autonomous environmental ombudsman that receives and investigates complaints against NEMA or any person, in relation to the environment including on EIA. The National Environmental Tribunal arbitrates over contentious matters. While the High Court is the final referee that may review and possibly overturn decisions by the Tribunal.

Decisions that can be appealed

Which EIA decisions can be appealed?

Any matter relating to the EMCA for which decisions have been made can be appealed against as long as the appeal falls within the period provided. Even decisions made by National Environmental Tribunal can be appealed against in the High Court.

Who can appeal

Who can make an appeal (in other words, has legal standing)?

Any person/ institution has the right to appeal on any matter relating to the EMCA.

EIA practice

to the top

Annual no. of EIAs

Gives an estimation for the number of full EIAs that are produced annually in this country.

Estimated at 1000 per year.

Central EIA database

Is there a central database or library where information on EIAs is kept (i.e. where all EIAs are registered and/or copies are archived). If so, what is kept there and is this information publicly accessible?

NEMA maintains a register of all  EIA licenses, reports, audit studies and monitoring reports.

Practice reviews

Any EIA practice review studies that have been done (by governmental agencies or others) are listed here. Where relevant, links to studies are included, and the main conclusions of the studies are summarised.

Development Process of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)Guidelines for Tourism Sector in Kenya:  The Government of Kenya through the Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife is in the process of developing the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Guidelines for tourism sector in Kenya. This process is supported by the European Union through Tourism Trust Fund under the auspices of Enabling Environment Grant.  

Report on the Development and Harmonization of Environmental Laws in East Africa Volume 3 is a book that reviews EIA laws in several countries including Kenya. It was Issued in June 1999 and was done under the auspices of UNEP, UNDP and the DUTCH joint project on Environmental laws and institutions in Africa   

Economic Commission for Africa, 2005.Review of the Application of Environmental Impact Assessment in Selected African Countries. ECA/SDD/05/13

Accreditation of consultants

Is there and accreditation system operational in the country to certify consultants to do EIAs?

Local and foreign EIA individuals and firms wishing to undertake EIA activities in Kenya must register with NEMA, and incur payment of a prescribed fee. A set of qualifications is required for lead and associate experts. The requirements relate to academic level (Doctorate/ Masters/ Bachelors) and education (has to including EIA training from a recognised institution) as well as practical experience (between 3-8 years). To register as a firm of experts, it is a requirement to be registered under the laws of Kenya and submit to NEMA a firm profile indicating capacity to undertake EIA/audit studies.

Professional bodies

Professional bodies relevant to EIA practice in the country, such as EIA Associations, Environmental Expert Associations, etc are listed here.

Kenya Institute of Environmental Assessment (KIEA): Established in March 2005 and objectives include promotion of best practices and ethical standards in environmental management, auditing and assessment, as well as improving the members knowledge and skills and enhancing the members’ professional capacity. KIEA also raises awareness and provide training on the EIA/Audit process amongst stakeholders.

Eastern Africa Association of Impact Assessment: EAAIA was formed to enable the Eastern Africa region to establish a well-managed database that acts as: a source of EA information, a mechanism for exchange and sharing of knowledge, information and experience on EA policies and practice; support maximization on the use of available resources in the region. Kenya is a member.                                                             

East African Network for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement (EANECE): Regional network of governmental agencies which have in their mandate environmental management, compliance and enforcement responsibilities in the East African nations of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi.

Non-governmental EIA guidance

Lists any EIA manuals and good practice publications (including checklists, case studies) that have been published by parties other than government.

  • UNEP, 2007. Guidelines for Impact Assessment in the Western Indian Ocean Region. Nairobi, Kenya. 
  • Joseph Opio-Odongo and Gregory Woodsworth (2004). Guidelines on Policy Analysis for Integrated Environmental Assessment and Reporting. UNDP Environmental Policy Specialists Regional Service Centre for Eastern and Southern Africa Nairobi, Kenya.

Capacity development

Ongoing training programmes (including professional and academic training) and major training events held in the past (with focus on recent events) are mentioned here.

NEMA Development of Curriculum for Environmental Experts: NEMA provides and updates a curriculum for the training of environmental impact assessment and audit (EIA/EA) experts. It supervises implementation, evaluation and review of the curriculum.  To improve the standard of service, NEMA has ensured that institutions' EIA/EA courses are registered with the Ministry of Education or the Department of Industrial Training (DIT). Persons with qualifications from non-recognized institutions do not qualify for registration as experts since they have not undergone the authorized curriculum. Institutions can purchase a copy the curriculum from NEMA at a cost of Kshs. 20,000. Institutions offering the NEMA-approved EIA/EA curriculum are required to cover it comprehensively. A strict adherence is also required to the curriculum in the evaluation of the course.

Professional Development (PD) Fellowship Program for East and Southern Africa.  CLEAA works with various environmental assessment leaders nationally, regionally and globally, in partnership with IUCN East and Southern Africa Regional Office (ESARO), with financial support from Swedish International development Agency (SIDA)  to promote and enhance Africa’s capacity in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), for better environmental governance and sustainable development.

Centre for Training and Integrated Research in Arid and Semi Arid Lands Development (CETRAD). They offer a 3 weeks course every year with a goal to create critical mass of EIA/EA expertise to meet the national goal of enhancing environmental integrity for sustainable development.

Kenyatta University (KU) School of Environmental Studies and Human Sciences; Department of Environmental Science. KU offers a Certificate course in Environmental Impact Assessment, auditing and Monitoring as part of their Undergraduate and Master’s degree in Environmental Science  

Kenya Environment Information Network (KEIN) is a multi-stakeholder capacity building program initiated by UNEP and NEMA to harness and improve access to information and knowledge to support the management of Kenya’s environmental resources as assets of sustainable development. The KEIN initiative brings together Kenyan institutions that generate environmental data to create a framework for cooperation and coordination amongst various stakeholders including for EIA studies. The program was is an outcome of Africa Environmental Information Network and started in January 2008.

EIA links

to the top

Links to laws/regulation

Any relevant links to laws or regulations are included here.